Dose-fractionation sensitivity of prostate cancer deduced from radiotherapy outcomes of 5,969 patients in seven international institutional datasets: α/β = 1.4 (0.9-2.2) Gy

被引:389
作者
Miralbell, Raymond [1 ,2 ]
Roberts, Stephen A. [3 ]
Zubizarreta, Eduardo [4 ]
Hendry, Jolyon H. [5 ]
机构
[1] Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital of Geneva
[2] Institut Oncològic Teknon, Barcelona
[3] Health Sciences - Methodology, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester
[4] International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
[5] Adlington, Macclesfield
来源
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012年 / 82卷 / 01期
关键词
Alpha/beta value; Fractionation sensitivity; Prostate cancer; Radiobiology; Radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.075
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: There are reports of a high sensitivity of prostate cancer to radiotherapy dose fractionation, and this has prompted several trials of hypofractionation schedules. It remains unclear whether hypofractionation will provide a significant therapeutic benefit in the treatment of prostate cancer, and whether there are different fractionation sensitivities for different stages of disease. In order to address this, multiple primary datasets have been collected for analysis. Methods and Materials: Seven datasets were assembled from institutions worldwide. A total of 5969 patients were treated using external beams with or without androgen deprivation (AD). Standard fractionation (1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction) was used for 40% of the patients, and hypofractionation (2.5-6.7 Gy per fraction) for the remainder. The overall treatment time ranged from 1 to 8 weeks. Low-risk patients comprised 23% of the total, intermediate-risk 44%, and high-risk 33%. Direct analysis of the primary data for tumor control at 5 years was undertaken, using the Phoenix criterion of biochemical relapse-free survival, in order to calculate values in the linear-quadratic equation of k (natural log of the effective target cell number), α (dose-response slope using very low doses per fraction), and the ratio α/β that characterizes dose-fractionation sensitivity. Results: There was no significant difference between the α/β value for the three risk groups, and the value of α/β for the pooled data was 1.4 (95% CI = 0.9-2.2) Gy. Androgen deprivation improved the bNED outcome index by about 5% for all risk groups, but did not affect the α/β value. Conclusions: The overall α/β value was consistently low, unaffected by AD deprivation, and lower than the appropriate values for late normal-tissue morbidity. Hence the fractionation sensitivity differential (tumor/normal tissue) favors the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules for all risk groups, which is also very beneficial logistically in limited-resource settings. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Printed in the USA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:e17 / e24
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Pollack A., Zagars G.K., Starkschall G., Prostate cancer radiation dose response: Results of the M.D. Anderson phase III randomized trial, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 53, pp. 1097-1105, (2002)
  • [2] Sathya J.R., Davis I.R., Julian J.A., Randomized trial comparing iridium implant plus external-beam radiation therapy with external-beam radiation therapy alone in node-negative locally advanced cancer of the prostate, J Clin Oncol, 23, pp. 1192-1199, (2005)
  • [3] Zietman A.L., Desilvio M.L., Slater J.D., Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: A randomized controlled trial, JAMA, 294, pp. 1233-1239, (2005)
  • [4] Dearnaley D.P., Sydes M.R., Graham J.D., Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: First results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial, Lancet Oncol, 8, pp. 475-487, (2007)
  • [5] Peeters S.T.H., Heemsbergen W.D., Koper P.C.M., Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy, J Clin Oncol, 24, pp. 1990-1996, (2006)
  • [6] Zelefsky M.J., Fuks Z., Hunt M., High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: Early toxicity and biochemical outcome in 772 patients, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 53, pp. 1111-1116, (2002)
  • [7] Cahlon O., Zelefsky M.J., Shippy A., Ultra-high dose (86.4 Gy) IMRT for localized prostate cancer: Toxicity and biochemical outcomes, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 71, pp. 330-337, (2008)
  • [8] Ares C., Popowski Y., Pampallona S., Hypofractionated boost with high-dose-rate brachytherapy and open magnetic resonance imaging-guided implants for locally aggressive prostate cancer: A sequential dose-escalation pilot study, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 75, pp. 656-663, (2009)
  • [9] Astrom L., Pedersen D., Mercke C., Long-term outcome of high dose rate brachytherapy in radiotherapy of localised prostate cancer, Radiother Oncol, 74, pp. 157-161, (2005)
  • [10] Demanes D.J., Rodriguez R.R., Schour L., High-dose-rate intensity-modulated brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: California endocurietherapy's 10-year results, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 61, pp. 1306-1316, (2005)