Energy efficiency and carbon emission analysis of hydrogen transport chains based on liquid hydrogen and ammonia

被引：0

作者：

Liu H. ^{[1
]}

Lin W. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai

来源：

Huagong Jinzhan/Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress | 2023年 / 42卷 / 03期

关键词：

ammonia; carbon emission; energy efficiency; hydrogen transportation chain; liquid hydrogen;

D O I：

10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0934

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

In recent years, more and more attentions are paid to hydrogen utilization. China will have a greater demand for hydrogen energy due to “carbon neutrality”, while Norway has rich natural gas resources and renewable energy, which can supply a large amount of blue hydrogen through natural gas hydrogen production combined with carbon capture and storage technology. However, how to overcome the difficulties of long-distance and large-scale transport is an urgent problem. Taking Norway to China and to Europe as examples, energy efficiency and carbon emission intensity as research parameters, and liquid hydrogen and ammonia as research objects, this study compared the two transport modes by selecting reasonable data for theoretical calculation, building the transport chain and drawing the energy flow diagram of each transport chain. The results showed that the energy efficiency of ammonia (no cracking) transport chain to Europe and China was 41.6% and 33.6%, respectively,which was higher than that of liquid hydrogen transport chain (37.65% and 33.38%) and ammonia (cracking) transport chain (30.39% and 24.83%). In terms of carbon emissions, ammonia (no cracking) transport chain had lower carbon emissions [135.87kg/(MW·h) and 110.76kg/(MW·h)] than liquid hydrogen transport chain [241.27kg/(MW·h) and 214.8kg/(MW·h)] and ammonia (cracking) transport chain [216.94kg/(MW·h) and 183.33kg/(MW·h)]. © 2023 Chemical Industry Press. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：1291 / 1298

页数：7

共 20 条

[1]

ZHAO Yongzhi, MENG Bo, CHEN Linxin, Et al., Utilization status of hydrogen energy, Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 34, 9, pp. 3248-3255, (2015)

[2]

China hydrogen energy and fuel cell industry white paper 2020, (2021)

[3]

ISHIMOTO Y, VOLDSUND M, NEKSA P, Et al., Large-scale production and transport of hydrogen from Norway to Europe and Japan: value chain analysis and comparison of liquid hydrogen and ammonia as energy carriers, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45, 58, pp. 32865-32883, (2020)

[4]

CAO Junwen, QIN Xiangfu, GENG Ga, Et al., Current status and prospects of hydrogen storage and transportation technology, Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 37, 6, pp. 1461-1478, (2021)

[5]

ZHOU Peng, LIU Qibin, SUI Jun, Et al., Research progress in chemical hydrogen storage, Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 33, 8, pp. 2004-2011, (2014)

[6]

CHEN Xiaolu, LIU Xiaomin, WANG Juan, Et al., Technology and standardization of liquid hydrogen storage and transportation, Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 40, 9, pp. 4806-4814, (2021)

[7]

HUANG Xuanxu, LIAN Jijian, SHEN Wei, Et al., Economic analysis of China’s large-scale hydrogen energy supply chain, Southern Energy Construction, 7, 2, pp. 1-13, (2020)

[8]

GIDDEY S, BADWAL S P S, MUNNINGS C, Et al., Ammonia as a renewable energy transportation media, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 5, 11, pp. 10231-10239, (2017)

[9]

MIURA D, TEZUKA T., A comparative study of ammonia energy systems as a future energy carrier, with particular reference to vehicle use in Japan, Energy, 68, pp. 428-436, (2014)

[10]

SHAN Tongwen, SONG Pengfei, LI Youwu, Et al., Storage and transportation technical support for international hydrogen supply chain and hydrogen trade, Modern Chemical Industry, 40, 1, pp. 8-13, (2020)

← 1 2 →