Multiple attribute decision making considering attribute aspirations: A method based on prospect theory

被引：0
|
作者：
School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang [1 ]
110004, China
机构：
[1] School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang
来源：
Kongzhi yu Juece Control Decis | / 1卷 / 91-97期
关键词：
Attribute aspirations; GPFCSP; Multiple attribute decision making; Prospect theory; Ranking;
D O I：
10.13195/j.kzyjc.2013.1572
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
A method based on the prospect theory is proposed to solve the multiple attribute decision making problem in which single and combination attribute aspirations are provided by the decision-maker. Firstly, according to the prospect theory, the attribute aspirations given by the decision-maker are regarded as the reference points. Then the prospect values of each alternative with regard to all single and combination attribute aspirations are calculated, respectively, and the comprehensive prospect value vector concerning each alternative is constructed. Based on this, the original decision problem is converted into the corresponding generalized prioritized fuzzy constraint satisfaction problem (GPFCSP). Further, the overall satisfaction degree of each alternative with regard to the corresponding reasoning standard is calculated, and the ranking of all alternatives can be determined. Finally, a numerical example is used to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed method. ©, 2015, Northeast University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：91 / 97
页数：6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Wang J.Q., Zhou L., Grey-stochastic multi-criteria decision-making approach based on prospect theory, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 30, 9, pp. 1658-1664, (2010)
  • [2] Liu P.D., Jin F., Zhang X., Et al., Research on the multi-attribute decision-making under risk with interval probability based on prospect theory and the uncertain linguistic variables, Knowledge-based Systems, 24, 4, pp. 554-561, (2011)
  • [3] Zhang X., Fan Z.P., Method for risky hybrid multiple attribute decision making based on prospect theory, J of Systems Engineering, 27, 6, pp. 772-781, (2012)
  • [4] Zhang X., Fan Z.P., A method for risky interval multiple attribute decision making based on prospect theory, Operations Research and Management Science, 21, 3, pp. 44-50, (2012)
  • [5] Lotfi V., Stewart T.J., An aspiration-level interactive model for multiple criteria decision making, Computers & Operation Research, 19, 7, pp. 671-687, (1992)
  • [6] Sun M., Steuer R.E., InterQuad: An interactive quad tree based procedure for solving the discrete alternative multiple criteria problem, European J of Operational Research, 89, 3, pp. 462-472, (1996)
  • [7] Wang J., Zionts S., Web AIM: An online aspiration-level interactive method, J of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, 13, 2-3, pp. 51-63, (2005)
  • [8] Nowak M., INSDECM-An interactive procedure for stochastic multi criteria decision problems, European J of Operational Research, 175, 3, pp. 1413-1430, (2006)
  • [9] Wang J., Zionts S., The aspiration level interactive method(AIM) reconsidered: Robustness of solutions, European J of Operational Research, 175, 2, pp. 948-958, (2006)
  • [10] Li D.Q., Cui H.M., Li H.X., A multiple decision making method based on satisfaction principle, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 12, 1, pp. 104-109, (2003)
123