Stability of noise annoyance

被引:1
作者
Socher, Michaela [1 ]
Zaglauer, Maria [1 ]
Babajic, Dzenan [1 ]
Sumalvico, Till [1 ]
Herget, Noemi [1 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Bldg Phys, Dept Acoust, Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
SHORT-TERM ANNOYANCE; SOUND INSULATION; AIRCRAFT NOISE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.110443
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Noise has been shown to have negative health consequences and studies have linked these consequences in part to the subjective annoyance caused by the noise. Subjective noise annoyance is often measured using a 11-point numeric scale (e.g. annoyance scale in ISO 15666:2021 previously ISO/TS 15666:2003). Thereby the mean annoyance rating of a group of participants is commonly used as the default measure of the annoyance induced by a specific sound. However, the quality of these annoyance measures (which were developed only for the use in field studies) in terms of stability in a controlled laboratory setting has not been evaluated yet. The aim of the current study was therefore to evaluate the between- and within participant stability of noise annoyance, as well as the stability of the mean annoyance within a group of participants and between two groups of participants as well as between different experimental settings. The results revealed a low between- and a low within participant stability, but a high stability of the mean annoyance. The general sound context (other sounds included in the experiment) had an influence on the noise annoyance ratings. The results were used to develop a mathematical model of noise annoyance. According to this model, the mean annoyance is not the measure of central tendency of the tested group but the cleaned annoyance. The cleaned annoyance is thereby not an estimate of the actual annoyance a person is expected to experience in relation to a certain sound. It is rather a measure of the part of noise annoyance that is explained by the acoustical properties and the sound context. Our model can explain the results from the current study as well as results from previous studies. Recommendations are made concerning the evaluation of noise annoyance in laboratory studies and future development of the mathematical model.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Aaboud M, 2019, J HIGH ENERGY PHYS, DOI 10.1007/JHEP08(2019)121
  • [2] User's guide to correlation coefficients
    Akoglu, Haldun
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 18 (03): : 91 - 93
  • [3] Single Item Measures in Psychological Science A Call to Action
    Allen, Mark S.
    Iliescu, Dragos
    Greiff, Samuel
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2022, 38 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [4] Arendt Cole, 2020, CRAN
  • [5] Auguie Baptiste, 2017, CRAN
  • [6] Aust F., 2022, PAPAJA PREPARE REPRO
  • [7] The influence of acoustical and non-acoustical factors on short-term annoyance due to aircraft noise in the field - The COSMA study
    Bartels, Susanne
    Marki, Ferenc
    Mueller, Uwe
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 538 : 834 - 843
  • [8] The influence of personality traits and gender on noise annoyance in laboratory studies
    Beheshti, Mohammad Hossein
    Taban, Ebrahim
    Samaei, Seyed Ehsan
    Faridan, Mohammad
    Khajehnasiri, Farahnaz
    Khaveh, Leila Tajik
    Jebeli, Maryam Borhani
    Mehri, Ahmad
    Tajpoor, Ali
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2019, 148 : 95 - 100
  • [9] Berchtold A., 2016, Methodol. Innov, V9, P1, DOI DOI 10.1177/2059799116672875
  • [10] Noise Annoyance Is Associated with Depression and Anxiety in the General Population- The Contribution of Aircraft Noise
    Beutel, Manfred E.
    Juenger, Claus
    Klein, Eva M.
    Wild, Philipp
    Lackner, Karl
    Blettner, Maria
    Binder, Harald
    Michal, Matthias
    Wiltink, Joerg
    Braehler, Elmar
    Muenzel, Thomas
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (05):