Application of cone-shaped scintillation detector for quality assurance in pencil beam scanning proton therapy systems

被引:0
|
作者
Lingjing, Pan [1 ]
Xianbao, Gu [2 ]
Yuanyuan, Wang [1 ]
Yangfan, Zhang [1 ]
Xiaoming, Lu [1 ,3 ]
Zhipeng, Liu [1 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Ion Medical Center, First Affiliated Hospital of University of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
[2] Anhui Environmental Radiation Supervision Station, Hefei
[3] Ion Medical Research Institute, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
来源
He Jishu/Nuclear Techniques | 2024年 / 47卷 / 08期
关键词
Cone-shaped scintillation detector; Pencil beam scanning (PBS); Proton therapy; Quality assurance; XRV-124;
D O I
10.11889/j.0253-3219.2024.hjs.47.080501
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
[Background] Pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton systems with a rotating gantry makes proton intensity modulation technology widely used for better protection of organs at risk, but it also brings greater challenges to the quality control of proton system. [Purpose] This study aims to verify the accuracy of an XRV-124 cone-shaped scintillation detector and to investigate its feasibility for use in PBS quality assurance (QA) procedures. [Methods] Firstly, according to the measurement principle of XRV-124, a single setup was implemented to measure the spot size, beam–X-ray coincidence, gantry angle, star-shot test, and mechanical accuracy simultaneously. Then, the spot size and beam – X-ray coincidence were determined at the isocenter using the XRV-124 for 70~240 MeV at increments of 10 MeV and at 30° increments for all gantry angles. The coincidence of the X-ray system and proton beam was evaluated in the X and Y directions of the International Electrotechnical Commission coordinate system (IEC). Finally, the spot size and coincidence results were compared with those of the widely used Lynx detector, whereas the gantry angle results were compared with those of the proton treatment console (PTC). [Results] The spot sizes obtained using the XRV-124 and Lynx are in good agreement within 0.10 mm for each energy, and the results show the same trend with a maximum deviation of 0.18 mm and 0.11 mm in the IEC-X and -Y directions, respectively. The gantry angles are less than 0.2° compared to those of the PTC. For the star-shot test, the average 3D and 2D distances from the isocenter are 0.4 mm and 0.2 mm, respectively, meets the quality control requirements. The QA items can be completed in 90 min. [Conclusions] This method of this study has been successfully applied to the QA of Varian ProBeam proton radiotherapy system in Hefei ion medical center, indicating that XRV-124 cone-shaped scintillation detector can be widely used in the same type of proton radiotherapy system to improve the QA efficiency and reduce the human error caused by frequent positioning. © 2024 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] LI Xiang, GAO Yunan, GAO Han, Et al., Simulation study of secondary neutron reflection distribution in proton therapy room, Nuclear Techniques, 44, 2, (2021)
  • [2] LIU Junya, YU Xiao, WU Chao, Et al., Design of an ultrahigh dose rate cell irradiation experimental platform using a medical proton linear injector, Nuclear Techniques, 46, 11, (2023)
  • [3] Cai W X, Oesten H, Clasie B, Et al., Semi-automated IGRT QA using a cone-shaped scintillator screen detector for proton pencil beam scanning treatments, Physics in Medicine and Biology, 64, 8, (2019)
  • [4] CHEN Tao, LI Xiufang, GUO Mengya, Et al., The application of Lynx-2D in proton spot scanning system commissioning, Nuclear Techniques, 41, 5, (2018)
  • [5] Rana S, Bennouna J, Samuel E J, Et al., Development and long-term stability of a comprehensive daily QA program for a modern pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy delivery system[J], Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 20, 4, pp. 29-44, (2019)
  • [6] Arjomandy B, Taylor P, Ainsley C, Et al., AAPM task group 224: comprehensive proton therapy machine quality assurance[J], Medical Physics, 46, 8, pp. e678-e705, (2019)
  • [7] Standard for testing of quality control in medical proton/heavy ion radiotherapy equipment: WS 816—2023, (2023)
  • [8] Russo S, Mirandola A, Molinelli S, Et al., Characterization of a commercial scintillation detector for 2-D dosimetry in scanned proton and carbon ion beams[J], Physica Medica: PM: an International Journal Devoted to the Applications of Physics to Medicine and Biology: Official Journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), 34, pp. 48-54, (2017)
  • [9] Vilches-Freixas G, Unipan M, Rinaldi I, Et al., Beam commissioning of the first compact proton therapy system with spot scanning and dynamic field collimation, The British Journal of Radiology, 93, 1107, (2020)
  • [10] Lin Y T, Clasie B, Lu H M, Et al., Impacts of gantry angle dependent scanning beam properties on proton PBS treatment[J], Physics in Medicine and Biology, 62, 2, pp. 344-357, (2017)