Flight-loads effects on horizontal tail free-play-induced limit cycle oscillation
被引:0
|
作者:
Chen, P.C.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
ZONA Technology, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ 85258, United States
ZONA Technology, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ 85258, United StatesZONA Technology, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ 85258, United States
Chen, P.C.
[1
,1
]
Lee, D.H.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
ZONA Technology, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ 85258, United States
ZONA Technology, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ 85258, United States
AIAAZONA Technology, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ 85258, United States
Lee, D.H.
[1
,1
,2
]
机构:
[1] ZONA Technology, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ 85258, United States
[2] AIAA
来源:
Journal of Aircraft
|
1600年
/
45卷
/
02期
关键词:
The purpose of this paper is to study the impact of the flight-loads effects on the free-play-induced limit cycle oscillation using a direct simulation approach. This is achieved by computing the transient responses of an F-16 aeroelastic model with various free-play angles in its horizontal tails under various trim conditions;
while subjected to external excitations due to gust or pilot input command. It is found that for the restrained structures;
limit cycle oscillation always occurs;
even with a very small free-play limit;
as long as the horizontal tail is unloaded. However;
once the horizontal tail is loaded at a trim condition;
limit cycle oscillation disappears;
even with a large free-play limit up to ±0.2 degrees. In contrast;
for the unrestrained structures;
even with large free-play limits up to ±0.1 degrees;
limit cycle oscillation occurs only within a short period of time when the horizontal tail is unloaded. This is because for a free-free aircraft;
when the horizontal tail is unloaded;
the aircraft is untrimmed and then a transient maneuver will be developed and;
consequently;
the horizontal tall is rapidly loaded. In addition;
it is unlikely that the F-16 can maintain an unloaded horizontal tail for a sufficiently long time until the limit cycle oscillation is fully developed. This suggests that the military specification for control surface free-play limit (±0.017 degrees) is probably too stringent for the F-16 and can be relaxed to reduce the manufacturing and maintenance costs;