A Strategy for Scaling-Up Intensive Silvopastoral Systems in Colombia

被引:55
作者
机构
[1] CIPAV, Cali
[2] FEDEGAN, Bogotá
[3] ELTI, New Haven, CT
来源
Calle, Z. (zoraida@cipav.org.co) | 1600年 / Taylor and Francis Inc.卷 / 32期
关键词
agricultural matrix; agroforestry; cattle ranching; ecological rehabilitation; sustainable livestock production;
D O I
10.1080/10549811.2013.817338
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Silvopastoral systems (SPS) enhance milk and meat production and are instrumental for the productive rehabilitation of degraded lands. Intensive silvopastoral systems (ISPS) combine fodder shrubs planted at high densities (>10,000 plants ha-1), trees and pastures. Scaling-up such systems requires incentives to address financial and knowledge barriers. In Colombia, the strategy for scaling-up SPS has combined five elements. First, participatory research on real farms contributed to optimize SPS in different agroecosystems and strengthened a network of pilot farms open to research and peer-to-peer technology transfer. Second, capacity building, training, and outreach activities spread the principles of SPS among farmers, field workers, researchers, extension workers, and policy makers. Third, pilot projects explored the role of incentives such as Payment for Environmental Services (PES), technical assistance, soft loans and bonus prices, in spreading SPS. Fourth, successful pilot projects were instrumental in influencing the livestock sector as well as the public policy agenda. Fifth, currently, large-scale projects aimed at mainstreaming SPS are applying the lessons learned in order to achieve landscape-scale benefits, enhance climate change adaptation and mitigation, and introduce SPS products to green markets. Recently, innovation networks have contributed to speed up the adaptation of SPS in different environmental and socioeconomic contexts. © 2013 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 693
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Alam M.R., Jahiruddin M.D., Islam I.S., Agroforestry for improving farm smallholdings, Silvopastoralism and sustainable land management: Proceedings of an International Congress on Silvopastoralism and Sustainable Management, pp. 41-43, (2005)
[2]  
Altieri M., Nicholls C., Funes F., The scaling up of agroecology: Spreading the hope for food sovereignty and resiliency, (2012)
[3]  
Boucher D., Elias P., Goodman L., May-Tobin C., Mulik K., Roquemore S., Grade A Choice? Solutions for deforestation-free meat, (2012)
[4]  
Calle A., What makes an early adopter? Transforming landscapes one farmer at a time, Tropical Resources Bulletin, 27, pp. 7-14, (2008)
[5]  
Calle A., Montagnini F., Zuluaga A.F., Farmers’ perceptions of silvopastoral system promotion in Quindío, Colombia, Bois et Forets des Tropiques, 300, 2, pp. 79-94, (2009)
[6]  
Calle Z., Murgueitio E., El guácimo, uno de los árboles más adaptables a los sistemas silvopastoriles del trópico americano, Carta Fedegán, 121, pp. 88-94, (2010)
[7]  
Calle Z., Piedrahita L., ¿Cómo diseñar estrategias para el manejo de plantas de interés para la conservación en paisajes ganaderos?, Revista Agroforestería en las Américas, 45, pp. 117-122, (2007)
[8]  
Calle Z., Murgueitio E., Chara J., Integrating forestry, sustainable cattleranching and landscape restoration, Unasylva 239, 63, 1, pp. 31-40, (2012)
[9]  
Calle Z., Murgueitio E., Giraldo C., Ospina S., Zapata A., Molina C.H., Reyes K., La leucaena Leucaena leucocephala no se comporta como una planta invasora en Colombia, Carta Fedegán, 127, pp. 70-80, (2011)
[10]  
Chara J., Murgueitio E., Zuluaga A.F., Giraldo C., Ganadería Colombiana sostenible, (2011)