Peer review: The biomedical bowling league

被引：1
|
作者：
Chai, Toby C. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 29 S. Greene St., Baltimore, MD 21201, United States
来源：
Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery | 2010年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1097/SPV.0b013e3181dead29
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：145 / 146
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Rewarding the quantity of peer review could harm biomedical research
    Al-Khatib, Aceil
    Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
    BIOCHEMIA MEDICA, 2019, 29 (02) : 200 - 205
  • [32] Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system
    Philip F Stahel
    Ernest E Moore
    BMC Medicine, 12
  • [33] Lesson of the Seventh International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication
    Hong, Sung-Tae
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 28 (10) : 1413 - 1414
  • [34] Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies
    Jefferson, T.
    Rudin, M.
    Brodney, Folse S.
    Davidoff, F.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (02):
  • [35] Bowling Alone: a review essay
    Durlauf, SN
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2002, 47 (03) : 259 - 273
  • [36] A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
    Glonti, Ketevan
    Cauchi, Daniel
    Cobo, Erik
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Moher, David
    Hren, Darko
    BMC MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [37] A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
    Ketevan Glonti
    Daniel Cauchi
    Erik Cobo
    Isabelle Boutron
    David Moher
    Darko Hren
    BMC Medicine, 17
  • [38] Blinding Models for Scientific Peer-Review of Biomedical Research Proposals: A Systematic Review
    Qussini, Seba
    MacDonald, Ross S.
    Shahbal, Saad
    Dierickx, Kris
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2023, 18 (04) : 250 - 262
  • [39] BIOMEDICAL PUBLISHING Secretive and Subjective, Peer Review Proves Resistant to Study
    Couzin-Frankel, Jennifer
    SCIENCE, 2013, 341 (6152) : 1331 - 1331
  • [40] Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
    Armen Yuri Gasparyan
    Lilit Ayvazyan
    Heather Blackmore
    George D. Kitas
    Rheumatology International, 2011, 31
12345