Product design for energy reduction in concurrent engineering: An inverted pyramid approach

被引：0
作者：
机构：
[1] Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Energy and Transportation Sci. Division, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6070, One Bethel Valley Road
[2] Industrial and Management Systems Engineering Dept., West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506
来源：
Alkadi, N.E. (alkadine@ornl.gov) | 2013年 / Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., 29, route de Pre-Bois, Case Postale 856, CH-1215 Geneva 15, CH-1215, Switzerland卷 / 15期
关键词：
Concurrent engineering; Design for X; DFX; Energy efficiency; Green design; Green manufacturing; Product design for energy; Sustainability;
D O I：
10.1504/IJISE.2013.055513
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The consideration of energy aspects as X in the design for X (DFX) paradigm in concurrent engineering (CE) is important for enabling reductions in operating costs, reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and enhancing sustainability. This research presents a CE methodology for the consideration of energy use in product development and manufacturing, specifically addressing the machining process. The research reported in this paper showcases the effectiveness of using a systematic integrated approach towards consideration of energy in product development, addressed through product, process, and system level parameters. It adds an important tool to the DFX toolbox for evaluation of the impact of design decisions on the product manufacturing energy requirement early during the design phases. The use of the inverted pyramid approach (IPA) has been described as an effective methodology for incorporation in expansion of the DFX toolbox. Copyright © 2013 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码：90 / 117
页数：27
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Ali A., Yassin K., Chelst R., Falkenburg D., A decision analytic framework for evaluating concurrent engineering, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46, 2, pp. 144-157, (1999)
  • [2] Alkadi N., Gopalakrishnan B., Banta L., Reheat Furnace Warm Charging Study at Weirton Steel Company, (2001)
  • [3] Atkinson S., Comparison of the energy efficiency of furnaces for the heat treatment of metals, Materials Technology Congress, (1986)
  • [4] Ayala J., Lopez-Vallejo M., Lopez-Barrio C., Veidenbaum A., A hardware mechanism to reduce energy consumption of the register file of in-order architectures, International Journal of Embedded Systems, 3, 4, pp. 285-293, (2008)
  • [5] Balamuralikrishna R., Athinarayanan R., Song X., The relevance of concurrent engineering in industrial technology programs, Journal of Industrial Technology, 16, 3, pp. 1-5, (2000)
  • [6] Balasubramanian S., Maturana F.P., Norrie D.H., Multi-agent planning and coordination for distributed concurrent engineering, International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 5, 2-3, pp. 153-179, (1996)
  • [7] Boothroyd G., Dewhurst P., Knight W., Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly, (1994)
  • [8] Bras B., Emblemsvag J., The use of activity based costing, uncertainty, and disassembly action charts in demanufacture cost assessments, ASME Advances in Design Automation Conference Proceedings, pp. 285-293, (1995)
  • [9] Desai A., Mital A., Simplifying the product maintenance process by building ease of maintenance into the design, International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 9, 4, pp. 434-454, (2011)
  • [10] Eppinger S., Model based approaches to managing concurrent engineering, Journal of Engineering Design, 2, 4, pp. 283-290, (2007)
123