Retopology and simplification of reality-based models for finite element analysis

被引：0

作者：

Rossoni M. ^{[1
]}

Barsanti S.G. ^{[1
]}

Colombo G. ^{[1
]}

Guidi G. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Politecnico di Milano, Italy

来源：

Computer-Aided Design and Applications | 2020年 / 17卷 / 03期

关键词：

Finite element analysis; Laser scanner; Retopology; Reverse engineering; Structure from motion;

D O I：

10.14733/cadaps.2020.525-546

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Reality-based 3D techniques and Finite Element Analysis share the way the object under investigation is discretized. Although their purpose, the generation methods and the quality metrics are different, both of them ground on the concept of mesh. Unfortunately, a mesh derived from a reality-based technique are not suitable to be used in a finite element solver directly. This paper aims at comparing different methods to prepare computational mesh of geometries derived from non-contact reality-based technologies. A benchmark test object has been acquired with different devices, a triangulation laser scanner, a multi-stripe triangulation scanner and a digital camera, and post processed in order to fix artifacts. Then, two different decimation approaches have been used: a triangular simplification and retopology. The acquired geometry, before and after the simplifications, has been compared with a CAD model employed as reference: mean and standard deviation between the nominal and the acquired geometries have been tracked. Finally, a tensile test has been simulated making use of a general-purpose finite element analysis software and the results have been compared with the exact solution. © 2020 CAD Solutions, LLC.

引用

页码：525 / 546

页数：21

共 31 条

[1]

Adhikary N., Gurumoorthy B., A slice-based algorithm for automatic and feature-preserving hole-filling in a CAD mesh model, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 15, 6, pp. 780-795, (2018)

[2]

Attene M., Campen M., Kobbelt L., Polygon mesh repairing, ACM Computing Surveys, 45, 2, pp. 1-33, (2013)

[3]

Berger M., Tagliasacchi A., Seversky L.M., Alliez P., Levine J.A., Sharf A., Silva C.T., State of the art in surface reconstruction from point clouds, Eurographics 2014-State of the Art Reports, (2014)

[4]

Bommes D., Levy B., Pietroni N., Puppo E., Silva C., Tarini M., Zorin D., Quad-mesh generation and processing: A survey, Computer Graphics Forum, 32, 6, pp. 51-76, (2013)

[5]

Bommes D., Zimmer H., Kobbelt L., Mixed-integer quadrangulation, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 28, 3, (2009)

[6]

Botsch M., Kobbelt L., Pauly M., Alliez P., Levy B., Polygon Mesh Processing, (2010)

[7]

Buonamici F., Carfagni M., Furferi R., Governi L., Lapini A., Volpe Y., Reverse engineering modeling methods and tools: A survey, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 15, 3, pp. 443-464, (2017)

[8]

Buonamici F., Carfagni M., Furferi R., Governi L., Lapini A., Volpe Y., Reverse engineering of mechanical parts: A template-based approach, Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 5, 2, pp. 145-159, (2018)

[9]

Burkhart T.A., Andrews D.M., Dunning C.E., Finite element modeling mesh quality, energy balance and validation methods: A review with recommendations associated with the modeling of bone tissue, Journal of Biomechanics, 46, 9, pp. 1477-1488, (2013)

[10]

Castellazzi G., D'altri A., Bitelli G., Selvaggi I., Lambertini A., From laser scanning to finite element analysis of complex buildings by using a semi-automatic procedure, Sensors, 15, 8, pp. 18360-18380, (2015)

← 1 2 3 4 →