Influence of "Government-Industry-University" Cooperation on Entrepreneurial Activity: Qualitative Comparative Analysis from the Perspective of Triple Helix

被引：0
|
作者：
Jia J.-F. [1 ]
Liu W.-P. [1 ]
Zhang W.-G. [2 ]
机构：
[1] School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang
[2] School of Public Administration, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan
来源：
Dongbei Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northeastern University | 2021年 / 42卷 / 11期
关键词：
Cooperation entrepreneurship; Entrepreneurial activity; Government-industry-university; QCA(qualitative comparative analysis); Triple helix;
D O I：
10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2021.11.017
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
To explore the complex causal mechanism that affects the differences in entrepreneurial activity among regions, based on the triple helix theory, the configuration thinking and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) method are used to integrate six conditional variables at three levels of government-industry-university. Results found that: any single element of government-industry-university does not constitute a necessary condition for high entrepreneurial activity in regions, and regions have not increased entrepreneurial activity in accordance with a certain fixed pattern. The driving mechanism of high entrepreneurial activity can be divided into three paths: "government-university" coordination-driven path, "government-industry" coordination-driven path and "industry-university" coordination-driven path. At present, no region uses the perfect synergy of "government-industry-university" to achieve high entrepreneurial activity, and it is limited to the coordinated operation of the two. © 2021, Editorial Department of Journal of Northeastern University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1640 / 1649
页数：9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Zhao Tao, Zhang Zhi, Liang Shang-kun, Digital economy, entrepreneurship, and high-quality economic development:Empirical evidence from urban China, Management World, 36, 10, pp. 65-76, (2020)
  • [2] Carayannis E G, Campbell D F J., Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?a proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology[J], International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1, 1, pp. 41-69, (2010)
  • [3] Galan-Muros V, Plewa C., What drives and inhibits university business cooperation in Europe? a comprehensive assessement[J], R & D Management, 46, 2, pp. 369-382, (2016)
  • [4] Yu C W., Understanding the ecosystems of Chinese and American entrepreneurship education[J], Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21, 2, pp. 1-18, (2018)
  • [5] Pique J M, Berbegal-Mirabent J, Etzkowitz H., Triple helix and the evolution of ecosystems of innovation:the case of Silicon Valley[J], Triple Helix, 5, 1, pp. 1-21, (2018)
  • [6] Temple P., The capitalization of knowledge:a triple helix of university-industry-government [J], Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 9, 3, pp. 142-144, (2010)
  • [7] Champenois C, Etzkowitz H., From boundary line to boundary space:the creation of hybrid organizations as a triple helix micro-foundation, Technovation, 76, pp. 28-39, (2018)
  • [8] Chen Jing, Zhang Xue-wen, Innovation-driven development and scientific and technical structural reform(2012-2017), Scientific Research, 36, 12, pp. 2116-2121, (2018)
  • [9] Lim D S K, Oh C H, de Clercq D., Engagement in entrepreneurship in emerging economies:interactive effects of individual-level factors and institutional conditions[J], International Business Review, 25, 4, pp. 933-945, (2016)
  • [10] Shane S, Venkataraman S., The promise ofentrepreneurship as a field of research[J], Academy of Management Review, 25, 1, pp. 217-226, (2000)
123