Combining qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate participation in costa rica's program of payments for environmental services

被引:65
作者
Arriagada, Rodrigo A. [1 ]
Sills, Erin O. [2 ]
Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. [3 ]
Ferraro, Paul J. [4 ]
机构
[1] School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501
[2] Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
[3] Institute of Public Policy and Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC
[4] Department of Economics Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA
关键词
Costa Rica; Iterative field research; Participatory econometrics; Payments for environmental services; Program evaluation;
D O I
10.1080/10549810802701192
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Costa Rican Program of Payments for Environmental Services provides financial compensation to forest owners for the environmental services generated by their forests. This program offers a unique opportunity to evaluate the impacts of direct incentive payments on conservation. In order to measure the causal effect of this program on outcomes of interest, it is fundamental to understand the factors that influence enrollment in the program. Economic theory suggests that opportunity costs are key, but many factors may determine and mediate the influence of these costs. This article reports findings from an integrated qualitative and quantitative approach to this question. Within an iterative field research framework, information was gathered through (a) semistructured interviews with government officials and forestry professionals, (b) case studies of participant and nonparticipant forest landowners based on in-depth interviews, field visits, and a review of records, and (c) a quantitative survey of participant and nonparticipant landowners. The semistructured interviews and case studies provide important insights that can be incorporated into the quantitative analysis, specifically by identifying potential determinants of program participation and land use change. Hypotheses about the relationship between program participation and the opportunity costs of participation are confirmed using both approaches. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 367
页数:24
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [11] Mayrand K., Paquin M., Payments for Environmental Services: A Survey and Assessment of Current Schemes, (2004)
  • [12] Miranda M., Dieperink C., Glasbergen P., Costa Rican environmental service payments: The use of a financial instrument in participatory forest management, Environmental Management, 38, pp. 562-571, (2006)
  • [13] Miranda M., Porras I., Moreno M., The Social Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica. A Quantitative Field Survey and Analysis of the Virilla Watershed, (2003)
  • [14] Ortiz E., Sage L., Borge C., Impacto del programa de pago de servicios ambientales en Costa Rica como medio de reducción de la pobreza en los medios rurales (Serie de Publicaciones RUTA), (2003)
  • [15] Pagiola S., Payments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica, (2006)
  • [16] Pagiola S., Arcenas A., Platais G., Can payment for environmental services help reduce poverty?, World Development, 33, 2, pp. 237-253, (2005)
  • [17] Pattanayak S.K., Valuing watershed services: Concepts and empirics from Southeast Asia, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 104, pp. 171-184, (2004)
  • [18] Pattanayak S.K., Butry D.T., Spatial complementary of forests and farms: Accounting for ecosystem services, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87, 4, pp. 995-1008, (2005)
  • [19] Pattanayak S.K., Wendland K., Nature's care: Diarrhea, watershed protection and biodiversity conservation in Flores, Indonesia, Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 10, pp. 2801-2819, (2007)
  • [20] Pfaff A., Robalino J., Sanchez-Azofeifa G.A., Payments for environmental services: Empirical analysis for Costa Rica, (2008)