Combining qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate participation in costa rica's program of payments for environmental services

被引:65
作者
Arriagada, Rodrigo A. [1 ]
Sills, Erin O. [2 ]
Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. [3 ]
Ferraro, Paul J. [4 ]
机构
[1] School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501
[2] Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
[3] Institute of Public Policy and Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC
[4] Department of Economics Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA
关键词
Costa Rica; Iterative field research; Participatory econometrics; Payments for environmental services; Program evaluation;
D O I
10.1080/10549810802701192
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Costa Rican Program of Payments for Environmental Services provides financial compensation to forest owners for the environmental services generated by their forests. This program offers a unique opportunity to evaluate the impacts of direct incentive payments on conservation. In order to measure the causal effect of this program on outcomes of interest, it is fundamental to understand the factors that influence enrollment in the program. Economic theory suggests that opportunity costs are key, but many factors may determine and mediate the influence of these costs. This article reports findings from an integrated qualitative and quantitative approach to this question. Within an iterative field research framework, information was gathered through (a) semistructured interviews with government officials and forestry professionals, (b) case studies of participant and nonparticipant forest landowners based on in-depth interviews, field visits, and a review of records, and (c) a quantitative survey of participant and nonparticipant landowners. The semistructured interviews and case studies provide important insights that can be incorporated into the quantitative analysis, specifically by identifying potential determinants of program participation and land use change. Hypotheses about the relationship between program participation and the opportunity costs of participation are confirmed using both approaches. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 367
页数:24
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Berg B.L., Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, (2004)
  • [2] Bryson A., Dorsett R., Purdon S., The Use of Propensity Score Matching in the Evaluation of Active Labour Market Policies, (2002)
  • [3] The World Fact Book, (2007)
  • [4] Distribution of Hectares Ontracted Through the Payment for Environmental Services Program, Per Year and Per Model, for the1997-2006 Period, (2007)
  • [5] Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005. Progress Towards Sustainable Forest Management, (2005)
  • [6] Hardner J., Rice R., Rethinking green consumerism, Scientific American, pp. 89-95, (2002)
  • [7] Hartshorn G., Ferraro P., Spergel B., Evaluation of the World Bank-GEF Ecomarkets Project in Costa Rica, (2005)
  • [8] Heckman J., Ichimura H., Todd P., Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator, Review of Economic Studies, 65, pp. 261-294, (1998)
  • [9] James A., Gaston K.J., Balmford A., Can we Afford to Conserve Biodiversity?, BioScience, 51, pp. 43-52, (2001)
  • [10] Kleinn C., Corrales L., Morales D., Forest area in Costa Rica: A comparative study of tropical forest cover estimates over time, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 73, pp. 17-40, (2002)