Human-Centered Design and Evaluation of a NeuroIS Tool for Flow Support

被引：0
作者：
Adam, Marc T. P. [1 ]
Bonenberger, Lukas [2 ]
Gimpel, Henner [3 ]
Lanzl, Julia [4 ]
机构：
[1] School of Information and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle
[2] Technical University of Applied Sciences Augsburg, FIM Research Center / Branch Business & Information Systems Engineering of Fraunhofer FIT / University of Hohenheim, Chair of Digital Management
[3] University of Hohenheim, Branch Business & Information Systems Engineering of Fraunhofer FIT/ FIM Research Center
[4] University of Hohenheim, Chair of Digital Management / Branch Business & Information Systems Engineering of Fraunhofer FIT / FIM Research Center
来源：
Journal of the Association for Information Systems | 2024年 / 25卷 / 04期
关键词：
Design Science Research; Flow; IT-Mediated Interruptions; NeuroIS;
D O I：
10.17705/1JAIS.00855
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Flow is a mental state in which a person is fully immersed and actively involved in a task, even during extrinsically motivated activities at work. IT-mediated interruptions can disrupt flow, with ramifications for workers’ well-being and work performance. In this design science research paper, we develop and evaluate design knowledge for neuroadaptive flow support systems. Building on foundations in flow theory, we conduct expert interviews and present a conceptual framework, three meta-requirements, and five design principles for flow support systems. We then implement the design principles in three prototypes and evaluate these prototypes in a lab experiment and a field study. With this paper on flow and IT-mediated interruptions in the work domain, we present an approach toward flow support systems that enable intelligent interruption management. © 2024 by the Association for Information Systems.
引用
收藏
页码：936 / 961
页数：25
相关论文
共 99 条
[31]  
Gregor S., Building theory in the sciences of the artificial, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, (2009)
[32]  
Gregor S., Hevner A. R., Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact, MIS Quarterly, 37, 2, pp. 337-355, (2013)
[33]  
Gregor S., Kruse L., Seidel S., Research perspectives: The anatomy of a design principle, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21, 6, pp. 1622-1652, (2020)
[34]  
Guo Y. M., Poole M. S., Antecedents of flow in online shopping: a test of alternative models, Information Systems Journal, 19, 4, pp. 369-390, (2009)
[35]  
Gupta A., Li H., Sharda R., Should I send this message? Understanding the impact of interruptions, social hierarchy and perceived task complexity on user performance and perceived workload, Decision Support Systems, 55, 1, pp. 135-145, (2013)
[36]  
Haapalainen E., Kim S., Forlizzi J. F., Dey A. K., Psycho-physiological measures for assessing cognitive load, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 301-310, (2010)
[37]  
Hair M., Renaud K. V., Ramsay J., The influence of self-esteem and locus of control on perceived email-related stress, Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 6, pp. 2791-2803, (2007)
[38]  
Hemp P., Death by information overload, Harvard Business Review, 87, 9, pp. 82-121, (2009)
[39]  
Hubler A. W., Wotherspoon T., Self-adjusting systems avoid chaos, Complexity, 14, 4, pp. 8-11, (2009)
[40]  
Iivari J., Editorial: A critical look at theories in design science research, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21, 3, pp. 502-519, (2020)
12345678910