Assessing the transformation products and fate of Oxytetracycline by simulated aerobic degradation tests

被引:4
作者
Ivanic F.M. [1 ]
Butler M. [1 ]
Borón C.I. [1 ]
Candal R.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] IIIA-UNSAM-CONICET, Instituto de Investigación e Ingeniería Ambiental, Escuela de Hábitat y Sostenibilidad (EHyS), Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), Campus Miguelete, 25 de mayo y Francia, 1650-San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires
关键词
Artificial water/sediment tests; Degradation products; Emerging contaminants; HPLC-MS; Tetracyclines; Toxicity bioassays;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140284
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Oxytetracycline (OTC) is a widely used broad-spectrum antibiotic, whose presence in water and sediments was reported in various regions of the world. The effects of OTC and other tetracyclines on the environment have been intensively studied although many of their transformation products (TPs) formed in the environment and their impact have not been yet fully characterized. Abiotic and biotic degradation tests under aerobic conditions at two pH values were carried out using OTC in artificial water/sediment systems to assess the effect of these variables on the environmental fate of the pollutant. HPLC-MSn was employed to detect and identify the main degradation products and pathways. Several transformations involved in the process were identified including alcohol oxidation, decarbonylation and hydroxylation. Differences in TPs and kinetics were found among degradation conditions, remarking a faster degradation of both OTC and TPs in the presence of microorganisms and at lower pH values. In summary, a total of 44 TPs were detected and structures were proposed for 20 of them, none of them having been previously reported. Furthermore, OTC degradation generated 24 TPs which remained in either solution or sediment, although none of them displayed higher algae toxicity than OTC. These results might be useful for planning future remediation and monitoring strategies. © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [11] Doi A.M., Stoskopf M.K., J. Aquat. Anim. Health, 12, pp. 246-253, (2000)
  • [12] Godfray H.C.J., Aveyard P., Garnett T., Hall J.W., Key T.J., Lorimer J., Pierrehumbert R.T., Scarborough P., Springmann M., Jebb S.A., Science, 361, (2018)
  • [13] Gorrochategui E., Jaumot J., Lacorte S., Tauler R., Trends Anal. Chem., 82, pp. 425-442, (2016)
  • [14] Han C.H., Park H.D., Kim S.B., Yargeau V., Choi J.W., Lee S.H., Park J.A., Water Res., 172, (2020)
  • [15] Henning N., Kunkel U., Wick A., Ternes T.A., Water Res., 137, pp. 290-300, (2018)
  • [16] Jiao S., Zheng S., Yin D., Wang L., Chen L., J. Environ. Sci., 20, pp. 806-813, (2008)
  • [17] Kamel A.M., Fouda H.G., Brown P.R., Munson B., J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 13, pp. 543-557, (2002)
  • [18] Karpov M., Seiwert B., Mordehay V., Reemtsma T., Polubesova T., Chefetz B., Water Res., 145, pp. 136-145, (2018)
  • [19] Kolar B., Arnus L., Jeretin B., Gutmaher A., Drobne D., Durjava M.K., Chemosphere, 115, pp. 75-80, (2014)
  • [20] Kovalakova P., Cizmas L., McDonald T.J., Marsalek B., Feng M., Sharma V.K., Chemosphere, 251, (2020)