Intelligent hybrid approaches utilizing time series forecasting error for enhanced structural health monitoring

被引:1
作者
Yousefifard, Hossein Safar [1 ]
Amiri, Gholamreza Ghodrati [2 ]
Darvishan, Ehsan [3 ]
Avci, Onur [4 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Nat Disasters Prevent Res Ctr, Hengam St, Tehran 6765163, Iran
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Roudehen Branch, Roudehen, Iran
[4] West Virginia Univ, Wadsworth Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 1306 Evansdale Dr, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
Structural Health Monitoring; Damage Detection; LSTM; GRU; ICEEMDAN; Bayesian Optimization; EMPIRICAL MODE DECOMPOSITION; DAMAGE DETECTION; LSTM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.112177
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Over the past decade, the growing importance of machine learning-based structural health monitoring (SHM) for early-stage damage detection has become evident. Time series forecasting, using deep learning, has emerged as a key focus, significantly contributing to improving damage detection, localization, and quantification processes. Researchers in SHM have conducted numerous studies utilizing neural networks based on time series forecasting, grounded in traditional methods. This study diverges from existing research by directly incorporating neural network prediction errors in time series for detecting, localizing, and quantifying damage. The proposed methods are well-suited for online structural monitoring. They eliminate the need for data classification methods and damage-sensitive feature extraction techniques by relying solely on training the neural network with data from structurally sound conditions. However, the testing process does require data from damaged conditions. To address the non-linear and non-stationary characteristics of the signals, the Improved Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (ICEEMDAN) method is applied for signal processing. This method processes response signals (i.e., time series) from three well-known benchmark structures: the University of Central Florida structure, the Qatar University Grandstand Simulator, and the Z24 Bridge. Subsequently, the first intrinsic mode function (IMF) obtained from signal decomposition is independently input into Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) neural networks for time series prediction. Optimal parameter values for the LSTM and GRU neural networks are chosen using the Bayesian Optimization (BO) algorithm before the prediction process. By introducing three indices-Statistical Distance Function (SDF), error index, and accuracy index-the evaluation not only emphasizes the accuracy of the methods but also explores the localization and quantification of damage. The results demonstrate that both ICEEMDAN-BOLSTM-SDF and ICEEMDAN-BO-GRU-SDF methods have successfully achieved accurate detection, localization, and quantification without the need for data classification and damage-sensitive feature extraction methods, and merely by utilizing data from healthy states for neural network training.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Online Hybrid Learning Methods for Real-Time Structural Health Monitoring Using Remote Sensing and Small Displacement Data
    Entezami, Alireza
    Arslan, Ali Nadir
    De Michele, Carlo
    Behkamal, Bahareh
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (14)
  • [42] Hybrid Method for Short-Term Time Series Forecasting Based on EEMD
    Yang, Yujun
    Yang, Yimei
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 61915 - 61928
  • [43] Vibration-response-only statistical time series structural health monitoring methods: A comprehensive assessment via a scale jacket structure
    Spanos, Nikos A.
    Sakellariou, John S.
    Fassois, Spilios D.
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2020, 19 (03): : 736 - 750
  • [44] Wireless Intelligent Sensor and Actuator Network - A Scalable Platform for Time-synchronous Applications of Structural Health Monitoring
    Sazonov, Edward
    Krishnamurthy, Vidya
    Schilling, Robert
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2010, 9 (05): : 465 - 476
  • [45] Error analysis of time delay based on ultrasonic phased array structural health monitoring
    Ji S.
    Gu F.
    Sun Y.
    Wang J.
    Ji, Sai (jisai@nuist.edu.cn), 2018, Computer Society of the Republic of China (29) : 176 - 184
  • [46] Active Learning Approaches to Structural Health Monitoring
    Bull, L.
    Manson, G.
    Worden, K.
    Dervilis, N.
    SPECIAL TOPICS IN STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, VOL 5, 2019, : 157 - 159
  • [47] Computer-aided hybrid time reversal process for structural health monitoring
    Jun, Yongju
    Lee, Usik
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 26 (01) : 53 - 61
  • [48] Comparison of Time Series Forecasting for Intelligent Transportation Systems in Digital Twins
    Ertuerk, Mehmet Ali
    ELECTRICA, 2024, 24 (02): : 375 - 384
  • [49] Development of IOT Based Smart Instrumentation for the Real Time Structural Health Monitoring
    Chowdhry, Bhawani Shankar
    Shah, Ali Akbar
    Uqaili, Muhammad Aslam
    Memon, Tayab
    WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 113 (03) : 1641 - 1649
  • [50] Simplicial Complex-Enhanced Manifold Embedding of Spatiotemporal Data for Structural Health Monitoring
    Xu, Nan
    Zhang, Zhiming
    Liu, Yongming
    INFRASTRUCTURES, 2023, 8 (03)