Intelligent hybrid approaches utilizing time series forecasting error for enhanced structural health monitoring

被引:1
作者
Yousefifard, Hossein Safar [1 ]
Amiri, Gholamreza Ghodrati [2 ]
Darvishan, Ehsan [3 ]
Avci, Onur [4 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Nat Disasters Prevent Res Ctr, Hengam St, Tehran 6765163, Iran
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Roudehen Branch, Roudehen, Iran
[4] West Virginia Univ, Wadsworth Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 1306 Evansdale Dr, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
Structural Health Monitoring; Damage Detection; LSTM; GRU; ICEEMDAN; Bayesian Optimization; EMPIRICAL MODE DECOMPOSITION; DAMAGE DETECTION; LSTM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.112177
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Over the past decade, the growing importance of machine learning-based structural health monitoring (SHM) for early-stage damage detection has become evident. Time series forecasting, using deep learning, has emerged as a key focus, significantly contributing to improving damage detection, localization, and quantification processes. Researchers in SHM have conducted numerous studies utilizing neural networks based on time series forecasting, grounded in traditional methods. This study diverges from existing research by directly incorporating neural network prediction errors in time series for detecting, localizing, and quantifying damage. The proposed methods are well-suited for online structural monitoring. They eliminate the need for data classification methods and damage-sensitive feature extraction techniques by relying solely on training the neural network with data from structurally sound conditions. However, the testing process does require data from damaged conditions. To address the non-linear and non-stationary characteristics of the signals, the Improved Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (ICEEMDAN) method is applied for signal processing. This method processes response signals (i.e., time series) from three well-known benchmark structures: the University of Central Florida structure, the Qatar University Grandstand Simulator, and the Z24 Bridge. Subsequently, the first intrinsic mode function (IMF) obtained from signal decomposition is independently input into Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) neural networks for time series prediction. Optimal parameter values for the LSTM and GRU neural networks are chosen using the Bayesian Optimization (BO) algorithm before the prediction process. By introducing three indices-Statistical Distance Function (SDF), error index, and accuracy index-the evaluation not only emphasizes the accuracy of the methods but also explores the localization and quantification of damage. The results demonstrate that both ICEEMDAN-BOLSTM-SDF and ICEEMDAN-BO-GRU-SDF methods have successfully achieved accurate detection, localization, and quantification without the need for data classification and damage-sensitive feature extraction methods, and merely by utilizing data from healthy states for neural network training.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hybrid Fiber Optic Sensor Systems in Structural Health Monitoring in Aircraft Structures
    Bednarska, Karolina
    Sobotka, Piotr
    Wolinski, Tomasz Ryszard
    Zakrecka, Oliwia
    Pomianek, Wiktor
    Nocon, Agnieszka
    Lesiak, Piotr
    MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (10)
  • [32] Enhanced data-driven Damage Detection for Structural Health Monitoring Systems
    Chaabane, Marwa
    Ben Hamida, Ahmed
    Mansouri, Majdi
    Nounou, Hazem
    Nounou, Mohamed
    2020 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES FOR SIGNAL AND IMAGE PROCESSING (ATSIP'2020), 2020,
  • [33] Piezoelectric paint sensor for real-time structural health monitoring
    Zhang, YF
    Smart Structures and Materials 2005: Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace, Pts 1 and 2, 2005, 5765 : 1095 - 1103
  • [34] Structural health monitoring utilizing Intel's Imote2 wireless sensor platform
    Nagayama, Tomonori
    Spencer, B. F., Jr.
    Rice, Jennifer A.
    SENSORS AND SMART STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGIES FOR CIVIL, MECHANICAL, AND AEROSPACE SYSTEMS 2007, PTS 1 AND 2, 2007, 6529
  • [35] Data fusion approaches for structural health monitoring and system identification: Past, present, and future
    Wu, Rih-Teng
    Jahanshahi, Mohammad Reza
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2020, 19 (02): : 552 - 586
  • [36] Transmissibility-based system identification for structural health Monitoring: Fundamentals, approaches, and applications
    Yan, Wang-Ji
    Zhao, Meng-Yun
    Sun, Qian
    Ren, Wei-Xin
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2019, 117 : 453 - 482
  • [37] Statistical Active-Sensing Structural Health Monitoring via Stochastic Time-Varying Time Series Models
    Ahmed, Shabbir
    Kopsaftopoulos, Fotis
    2022 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, ACC, 2022, : 3599 - 3606
  • [38] Hybridization of hybrid structures for time series forecasting: a review
    Hajirahimi, Zahra
    Khashei, Mehdi
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2023, 56 (02) : 1201 - 1261
  • [39] Time series analysis for vibration-based structural health monitoring: A review
    Tee K.F.
    SDHM Structural Durability and Health Monitoring, 2018, 12 (03): : 129 - 147
  • [40] Structural health monitoring by Lyapunov exponents of non-linear time series
    Casciati, F
    Casciati, S
    STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2006, 13 (01) : 132 - 146