Enhancing energy-efficient building design: a multi-agent-assisted MOEA/D approach for multi-objective optimization

被引:1
作者
Guo, Wei [1 ]
Dong, Yaqiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Henan University of Urban Construction, Pingdingshan
关键词
Energy-efficient building design; Global optimization; Local fine search; Multi-agent-assisted MOEA/D; Multi-objective optimization;
D O I
10.1186/s42162-024-00406-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Energy-efficient building design is often challenged by multiple optimization problems due to contradictory objectives that are often hard to balance, so an effective optimization method should be thoroughly considered. Accordingly, a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm is then proposed. Firstly, the multi-agent auxiliary objective evolutionary algorithm for building energy efficiency model is established. According to model result analysis, the proposed algorithm runs fastest for 1640s with the average running time of 1710s in a single-room building, comparing to the least running time of 1680s for the multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm. In multi-room buildings, the proposed algorithm runs from 3350s to 3650s, with the average running time of 3500s. In conclusion, the model proposed in this study can comprehensively consider multiple objectives such as energy consumption, cost, comfort, etc. No matter in single-room or multi-room buildings, the model demonstrates superior performance and stability to realize comprehensive optimization of energy conservation design. © The Author(s) 2024.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Aboud A., Rokbani N., Fdhila R., DPb-MOPSO: a dynamic pareto bi-level multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm, Appl Soft Comput, 15, 1, pp. 5-10, (2022)
[2]  
Akhtar M.N., Aitani A.M., Ummer A.C., Alasiri H.S., Review on the catalytic conversion of naphtha to aromatics: advances and outlook, Energy Fuels, 37, 4, pp. 2586-2607, (2023)
[3]  
Bahrami-Novin N., Mahdavi E., Shaban M., Mazaheri H., Multi-objective optimization of tensile properties of the corrugated composite sheet, J Compos Mater, 56, 5, pp. 811-821, (2022)
[4]  
Banadkooki F.B., Haghighi A.T., Groundwater level modeling using multiobjective optimization with hybrid artificial intelligence methods, Environ Model Assess, 29, 1, pp. 45-65, (2024)
[5]  
Bo Y., Gu F.H., Dual-population co-evolution multi-objective optimization algorithm and its application: power allocation optimization of mobile base stations, Int J Cogn Inf Nat Intell, 16, 1, pp. 211-231, (2022)
[6]  
Brooks M., Abdellatif M., Alkhaddar R., Application of life cycle carbon assessment for a sustainable building design: a case study in the UK, Int J Green Energy, 18, 5, pp. 351-362, (2021)
[7]  
Chen J., Fujii Y., Johnson M., Optimal design of the bearingless induction motor, IEEE Trans Ind Appl, 57, 2, pp. 1375-1388, (2020)
[8]  
Datta S., Kapoor R., Mehta P., A multi-objective optimization model for outpatient care delivery with service fairness, Bus Process Manage J, 29, 3, pp. 630-652, (2023)
[9]  
Dong Z., Wang X., Tang L.X., MOEA/D with a self-adaptive weight vector adjustment strategy based on chain segmentation, Inf Sci, 521, pp. 209-230, (2020)
[10]  
Gao J.L., Xing Q.H., Fan C.L., Liang Z.B., Double adaptive selection strategy for MOEA/D, J Syst Eng Electron, 30, 1, pp. 132-143, (2019)