Effects of blood flow and vessel geometry on wall stress and rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms

被引:28
作者
Li, Z. [1 ]
Kleinstreuer, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh
关键词
D O I
10.1080/03091900500217406
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sudden rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), often without prior medical warning, is the 13th leading cause of mortality in the US. The local rupture is triggered when the elusive maximum local wall stress exceeds the patient's yield stress. Employing a validated fluid-structure interaction code, the coupled blood flow and AAA wall dynamics were simulated and analysed for two representative asymmetric AAAs with different neck angles and iliac bifurcations. It turned out that the AAA morphology plays an important role in wall deformation and stress distribution, and hence possible rupture. The neck angle substantially impacts flow fields. A large neck angle may cause strong irregular vortices in the AAA cavity and may influence the wall stress distribution remarkably. The rupture risk of lateral asymmetric AAAs is higher than for the anterior-posterior asymmetric types. The most likely rupture site is located near the anterior distal side for the anterior-posterior asymmetric AAA and the left distal side in the lateral asymmetric AAA. © 2006 Informa UK Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 297
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Vorp D.A., Raghavan M., Webster M., Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: Influence of diameter and asymmetry, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 27, pp. 632-639, (1998)
  • [2] Raghavan M., Vorp D., Federle M., Makaroun M., Webster M., Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 31, pp. 760-769, (2000)
  • [3] Li Z., Kleinstreuer C., A new wall stress equation for aneurysm-rupture prediction, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 33, pp. 209-213, (2005)
  • [4] Elger D.F., Blackketter D.M., Budwig R.S., Johansen K.H., The influence of shape on the stresses in model abdominal aortic aneurysms, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering - Transactions of the ASME, 118, pp. 326-332, (1996)
  • [5] Finol E.A., Keyhani K., Amon C.H., The effect of asymmetry in abdominal aortic aneurysms under physiologically realistic pulsatile flow conditions, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering - Transactions of the ASME, 125, pp. 207-217, (2003)
  • [6] Fillinger M.F., Raghavan M.L., Marra P., Cronenwett L., Kennedy E., In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 36, pp. 589-596, (2002)
  • [7] Fillinger M.F., Marra P.S., Raghavan M.L., Kennedy E.F., Prediction of rupture in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: Wall stress versus diameter, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 37, pp. 724-732, (2003)
  • [8] Raghavan M.L., Webster M.W., Vorp D.A., Ex vivo biomechanical behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Assessment using a new mathematical model, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 24, pp. 573-582, (1996)
  • [9] Thubrikar M.J., Labrosse M., Robicsek F., Al-Soudi J., Mechanical properties of abdominal aortic ansuerysm wall, Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 25, pp. 133-142, (2000)
  • [10] Thubrikar M., Al-Soudi J., Robicsek F., Wall stress studies of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a clinical model, Annals of Vascular Surgery, 3, pp. 355-366, (2001)