Projecting technological advancement of electrolyzers and the impact on the competitiveness of hydrogen

被引:5
作者
Buehler, Lauritz [1 ,2 ]
Moest, Dominik [2 ]
机构
[1] Boysen TU Dresden Res Training Grp, Chemnitzer Str 48b, D-01187 Dresden, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Chair Business Adm, Esp Energy Econ, Munchner Pl 3, D-01069 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Alkaline electrolysis; Proton exchange membrane electrolysis; Solid oxide electrolysis; Learning curve; Experience curve; Technological learning; CAPEX; Electrical consumption; Hydrogen production costs; Levelized cost of hydrogen; Monte Carlo simulation; POWER-TO-GAS; WATER ELECTROLYSIS; FUTURE; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.078
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Green hydrogen has the potential to decarbonize hard-to-abate sectors and processes and should, therefore, play an important role in the energy system in achieving climate goals. However, the main hydrogen supply is still based on fossil fuels, and only limited amounts of electrolyzers have been installed. Switching from fossil-based fuel sources to green hydrogen is highly dependent on when and at what price green hydrogen will become available, which in turn is dependent on the technological development of electrolyzers. In this paper, we apply the experience curve methodology to project the capital expenditure and electrical consumption developments of the three main electrolysis technologies: alkaline, proton exchange membrane and solid oxide electrolysis. Based on our calculations, we expect that both AEL and PEM will reach similar costs by 2030 of around 300 <euro> per kW and SOEC will remain the most expensive technology, with a considerable cost reduction down to 828 <euro> per kW. The electrical consumptions will fall to 4.23 kWh per Nm3 for AEL, 3.86 kWh per Nm3 for PEM and 3.05 kWh per Nm3 for SOEC. Based on this technological progress, we calculate that the levelized cost of hydrogen will be reduced to 2.43-3.07 <euro> per kg. To reach lower levelized cost of hydrogen, notable reductions in electricity (purchase) cost are required.
引用
收藏
页码:1174 / 1184
页数:11
相关论文
共 76 条
[31]   Is blue hydrogen a bridging technology?-The limits of a CO2 price and the role of state-induced price components for green hydrogen production in Germany [J].
George, Jan Frederick ;
Mueller, Viktor Paul ;
Winkler, Jenny ;
Ragwitz, Mario .
ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 167
[32]   Advances in power-to-gas technologies: cost and conversion efficiency [J].
Glenk, Gunther ;
Holler, Philip ;
Reichelstein, Stefan .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 16 (12) :6058-6070
[33]   Cost Dynamics of Clean Energy Technologies [J].
Glenk G. ;
Meier R. ;
Reichelstein S. .
Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 2021, 73 (2) :179-206
[34]  
Hans Bohm, Innovative large-scale energy storage technologies and power-to-gas concepts after optimization: Report on experience curves and economies of scale
[35]  
Hans Noordende, Next level solid oxide electrolysis: Upscaling potential and techno-economical evaluation for 3 industrial use cases
[36]  
Hassen Sied, 2020, Energy Transition Strategies Working Paper
[37]   Recent advances in solid oxide cell technology for electrolysis [J].
Hauch, A. ;
Kungas, R. ;
Blennow, P. ;
Hansen, A. B. ;
Hansen, J. B. ;
Mathiesen, B. V. ;
Mogensen, M. B. .
SCIENCE, 2020, 370 (6513) :186-+
[38]  
Hebling C., 2019, Eine Wasserstoff-Roadmap fur Deutschland"
[39]   Technical and economic analysis of different colours of producing hydrogen in China [J].
Huang, Junbo ;
Balcombe, Paul ;
Feng, Zongxian .
FUEL, 2023, 337
[40]   Techno-Economic Analysis of Photovoltaic Hydrogen Production Considering Technological Progress Uncertainty [J].
Huang, Xiang ;
Qu, Yapan ;
Zhu, Zhentao ;
Wu, Qiuchi .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (04)