A novel approach for large-scale wind energy potential assessment

被引:1
作者
Dai, Tao [1 ,2 ]
Scown, Corinne D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Joint BioEnergy Inst, Life Cycle Econ & Agron Div, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA
[2] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Biosci Area, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Energy Technol Area, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Energy Biosci Inst, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Wind energy; Power density; Gaussian process regression; Renewable energy; Sustainable development; Machine learning; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2025.115333
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Increasing wind energy generation is central to grid decarbonization, yet methods to estimate wind energy potential are not standardized, leading to inconsistencies and even skewed results. This study aims to improve the fidelity of wind energy potential estimates through an approach that integrates geospatial analysis and machine learning (i.e., Gaussian process regression). We demonstrate this approach to assess the spatial distribution of wind energy capacity potential in the Contiguous United States (CONUS). We find that the capacitybased power density ranges from 1.70 MW/km(2) (25th percentile) to 3.88 MW/km2 (75th percentile) for existing wind farms in the CONUS. The value is lower in agricultural areas (2.73 + 0.02 MW/km(2), mean + 95 % confidence interval) and higher in other land cover types (3.30+ 0.03 MW/km(2)). Notably, advancements in turbine manufacturing could reduce power density in areas with lower wind speeds by adopting low specificpower turbines, but improve power density in areas with higher wind speeds (>8.35 m/s at 120m above the ground), highlighting opportunities for repowering existing wind farms. Wind energy potential is shaped by wind resource quality and is regionally characterized by land cover and physical conditions, revealing significant capacity potential in the Great Plains and Upper Texas. The results indicate that areas previously identified as hot spots using existing approaches (e.g., the west of the Rocky Mountains) may have a limited capacity potential due to low wind resource quality. Improvements in methodology and capacity potential estimates in this study could serve as a new basis for future energy systems analysis and planning.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Anderson JR., 1976, LAND USE LAND COVER, DOI DOI 10.3133/PP964
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, World Resources 1994-95, P352
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Final Biological Assessment Castle Peak and Eightmile Flat Oil and Gas Expansion Project, P1
[4]   Land Resources for Wind Energy Development Requires Regionalized Characterizations [J].
Dai, Tao ;
Jose Valanarasu, Jeya Maria ;
Zhao, Yifan ;
Zheng, Shuwen ;
Sun, Yinong ;
Patel, Vishal M. ;
Jordaan, Sarah M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 58 (11) :5014-5023
[5]   Gaussian Process Regression as a Replicable, Streamlined Approach to Inventory and Uncertainty Analysis in Life Cycle Assessment [J].
Dai, Tao ;
Jordaan, Sarah M. ;
Wemhoff, Aaron P. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 56 (06) :3821-3829
[6]  
Denholm P, 2022, NREL/TP-6A40-81644, DOI [10.2172/1885591, DOI 10.2172/1885591]
[7]  
Denholm Paul., 2009, LAND USE REQUIREMENT
[8]   Geographic context affects the landscape change and fragmentation caused by wind energy facilities [J].
Diffendorfer, Jay E. ;
Dorning, Monica A. ;
Keen, Jolene R. ;
Kramer, Louisa A. ;
Taylor, Robert, V .
PEERJ, 2019, 7
[9]   Land Cover and Topography Affect the Land Transformation Caused by Wind Facilities [J].
Diffendorfer, Jay E. ;
Compton, Roger W. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02)
[10]  
Draxl C, 2015, Overview and meteorological validation of the wind integration national dataset toolkit