A sparse representation method for seismic data: adaptive multilayered dictionary learning (AMDL)

被引:0
作者
Yong H. [1 ,2 ]
Han D. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang J. [1 ,2 ]
Wang J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] College of Instrumentation and Electrical Engineering, Jilin University, Jilin
[2] Key Laboratory of Geophysical Exploration Equipment, Ministry of Education, Jilin
来源
Shiyou Diqiu Wuli Kantan/Oil Geophysical Prospecting | 2022年 / 57卷 / 03期
关键词
AMDL; CS; Seismic data; Sparse coding; Sparse representation;
D O I
10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2022.03.003
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The accuracy of seismic data reconstruction by compressed sensing (CS) largely depends on the performance of the dictionary used for sparse representation. The sparsity level of each training sample in the K-singular value decomposition (K-SVD) is fixed, which may lead to under-fitting or over-fitting of the original sample. Moreover, it only uses the features of the original samples as the training dictionary and cannot utilize the implicit features generated in the dictionary learning process, which affects the reconstruction accuracy. In this paper, we adopt the adaptive multilayered dictionary learning (AMDL) method for the sparse representation of seismic data to improve the K-SVD method. It not only makes full use of the features at different levels in the dictionary learning process but also adaptively determines the number of atoms chosen for each layer. The experimental results show that the method can provide a more accurate sparse representation for CS-based reconstruction of seismic data than the K-SVD method. © 2022, Editorial Department OIL GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 531
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
DONOHO D L., Compressed sensing, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52, 4, pp. 1289-1306, (2006)
[2]  
CANDES E J, WAKIN M B., An introduction to compressive sampling, IEEE Signal Processing Ma-gazine, 25, 2, pp. 21-30, (2008)
[3]  
HERRMANN F J., Randomized sampling and sparsity: getting more information from fewer samples, Geophysics, 75, 6, pp. WB173-WB187, (2010)
[4]  
HERRMANN F J, FRIEDLANDER M P, YILMAZ O., Fighting the curse of dimensionality: compressive sensing in exploration seismology, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 29, 3, pp. 88-100, (2012)
[5]  
HUANG Xiaogang, A simulation of acquisition design and data processing for offshore compressive sensing seismic, Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 55, 2, pp. 248-256, (2020)
[6]  
SONG Weiqi, WU Caiduan, Seismic data resolution improvement based on compressed sensing, Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 52, 2, pp. 214-219, (2017)
[7]  
MA J W, PLONKA G, CHAURIS H., A new sparse representation of seismic data using adaptive easy-path wavelet transform, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 7, 3, pp. 540-544, (2010)
[8]  
CHEN Zubin, WANG Lizhi, SONG Yang, Et al., Seismic data real-time compression and high-precision reconstruction in the wavelet domain based on the compressed sensing, Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 53, 4, pp. 674-681, (2018)
[9]  
TIAN X, ABDI A, LIU E T, Et al., Memory-assisted seismic signal compression based on dictionary lear-ning and sparse coding, 2017 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (Global SIP), pp. 358-362, (2017)
[10]  
ZHAO Ziyue, LI Zhenchun, ZHANG Min, Seismic data Reconstruction using discrete orthonormal S-Transform based on compressive sensing, Oil Geo-physical Prospecting, 55, 1, pp. 29-35, (2020)