Perceived Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction: A Review

被引:2
作者
Tusseyeva, Inara [1 ,2 ]
Sandygulova, Anara [3 ]
Rubagotti, Matteo [3 ]
机构
[1] Astana IT Univ, Dept Intelligent Syst & Cybersecur, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
[2] Nazarbayev Univ, Inst Smart Syst & Artificial Intelligence, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
[3] Nazarbayev Univ, Sch Engn & Digital Sci, Dept Robot & Mechatron, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
关键词
Robots; Human-robot interaction; Reviews; Robot sensing systems; Humanoid robots; Surveys; Semantics; Manipulators; Internet; Habituation; human-robot interaction; perceived intelligence; pre-test-post-test variation; ANTHROPOMORPHISM; GESTURES; ANIMACY;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3478751
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to provide a survey on the perception of robot intelligence. After a general overview, the paper specifically focuses on how perceived intelligence varies either between before and after the experiment ("pre-test-post-test variation"), and in subsequent sessions due to habituation. After reviewing the main characteristics of autonomous agents and robots that have been shown in the literature to influence the perception of robot intelligence, papers focusing on the variation in time of perceived intelligence are analyzed in detail. Even if no unanimous conclusion was reached in the literature, evidence suggests that, in general, when a significant variation is detected, perceived intelligence tends to increase from pre-test to post-test evaluations when commercial or more recent robot platforms are used, while it tends to decrease in the case of custom-made or less recent robots. On the other hand, when a significant variation is detected, perceived intelligence seems to increase due to habituation.
引用
收藏
页码:151348 / 151359
页数:12
相关论文
共 82 条
[31]  
John P. K., 2022, P CHI C HUM FACT COM, V49, P1
[32]  
Keizer S, 2014, IEEE ROMAN, P318
[33]  
Keizer S, 2014, IEEE ROMAN, P312, DOI 10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926271
[34]   Service robots: Applying social exchange theory to better understand human-robot interactions [J].
Kim, Hyunsu ;
So, Kevin Kam Fung ;
Wirtz, Jochen .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2022, 92
[35]   Factors affecting trust in high-vulnerability human-robot interaction contexts: A structural equation modelling approach [J].
Kim, Wonjoon ;
Kim, Nayoung ;
Lyons, Joseph B. ;
Nam, Chang S. .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2020, 85
[36]  
Kluy Lina, 2021, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, P77, DOI 10.1177/1071181321651110
[37]  
Koay KL, 2007, 2007 RO-MAN: 16TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION, VOLS 1-3, P563
[38]   Effects of Embodiment and Gestures on Social Interaction in Drumming Games with a Humanoid Robot [J].
Kose-Bagci, Hatice ;
Ferrari, Ester ;
Dautenhahn, Kerstin ;
Syrdal, Dag Sverre ;
Nehaniv, Chrystopher L. .
ADVANCED ROBOTICS, 2009, 23 (14) :1951-1996
[39]  
Krening Samantha, 2018, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, V62, P1637, DOI 10.1177/1541931218621371
[40]   The Interplay Between Emotional Intelligence, Trust, and Gender in Human-Robot Interaction A Vignette-Based Study [J].
Law, Theresa ;
Chita-Tegmark, Meia ;
Scheutz, Matthias .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2021, 13 (02) :297-309