Adaptive control architectures for mitigating sensor attacks in cyber-physical systems

被引:0
作者
Yucelen T. [1 ]
Haddad W.M. [2 ]
Feron E.M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
[2] School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
关键词
adaptive control; asymptotic stability; cyber-physical systems; Linear dynamical systems; sensor attacks; uniform ultimate boundedness;
D O I
10.1080/23335777.2016.1244562
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The accuracy of sensor measurements is critical to the design of high-performance control systems since sensor uncertainties can significantly deteriorate achievable closed-loop dynamical system performance. Sensor uncertainty can arise due to low sensor quality, sensor failure or detrimental environmental conditions. For example, relatively cheap sensor suites are used for low-cost, small-scale unmanned vehicle applications that can result in inaccurate sensor measurements. Alternatively, sensor measurements can also be corrupted by malicious attacks if dynamical systems are controlled through large-scale, multilayered communication networks as is the case in cyber-physical systems. This paper presents several adaptive control architectures for stabilisation of linear dynamical systems in the presence of sensor uncertainty and sensor attacks. Specifically, we propose new and novel adaptive controllers for state-independent and state-dependent sensor uncertainties. In particular, we show that the proposed controllers guarantee asymptotic stability of the closed-loop dynamical system when the sensor uncertainties are time-invariant and uniform ultimate boundedness when the uncertainties are time-varying. We further discuss the practicality of the proposed approaches and provide several numerical examples to illustrate the efficacy of the proposed adaptive control architectures. © 2016, © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 52
页数:28
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Antsaklis P., Goals and challenges in cyber-physical systems research, IEEE Trans Autom Control, 59, pp. 3117-3119, (2014)
[2]  
Massoumnia M.-A., Verghese G.C., Willsky A.S., Failure detection and identification, IEEE Trans Autom Control, 34, pp. 316-321, (1989)
[3]  
Blanke M., Schroder J., Diagnosis and fault-tolerant control, 691, (2006)
[4]  
Schenato L., Sinopoli B., Franceschetti M., Et al., Foundations of control and estimation over lossy networks, Proc IEEE, 95, pp. 163-187, (2007)
[5]  
Gupta A., Langbort C., Basar T., Optimal control in the presence of an intelligent jammer with limited actions, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 1096-1101, (2010)
[6]  
Pasqualetti F., Dorfler F., Bullo F., Attack detection and identification in cyber-physical systems -- part I: models and fundamental limitations, (2012)
[7]  
Pasqualetti F., Dorfler F., Bullo F., Attack detection and identification in cyber-physical systems -- part II: centralized and distributed monitor design, (2012)
[8]  
Pasqualetti F., Dorfler F., Bullo F., Attack detection and identification in cyber-physical systems, IEEE Trans Autom Control, 58, pp. 2715-2729, (2013)
[9]  
Fawzi H., Tabuada P., Diggavi S., Secure estimation and control for cyber-physical systems under adversarial attacks, IEEE Trans Autom Control, 59, pp. 1454-1467, (2012)
[10]  
Weimer J., Bezzo N., Pajic M., Pappas G.J., Sokolsky O., Lee I., Resilient parameter-invariant control with application to vehicle cruise control, Control of cyber-physical systems, pp. 197-216, (2013)