A Model-Driven Framework for Composition-Based Quantum Circuit Design

被引:1
作者
Gemeinhardt, Felix [1 ]
Garmendia, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
Wimmer, Manuel [1 ]
Wille, Robert [3 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Business Informat Software Engn, Linz, Austria
[2] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Madrid, Spain
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Munich, Germany
来源
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON QUANTUM COMPUTING | 2024年 / 5卷 / 04期
基金
奥地利科学基金会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Quantum computing; quantum software engineering; quantum circuits; model-driven engineering; quantum software languages; TRANSFORMATION; SOFTWARE;
D O I
10.1145/3688856
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Quantum programming languages support the design of quantum applications. However, to create such programs, one needs to understand the fundamental characteristics of quantum computing and quantum information theory. Furthermore, quantum algorithms frequently make use of abstract operations with a hidden to a higher-level view of quantum circuit design not only reduces the development effort but also lowers the entry barriers for non-quantum computing experts. To this end, this article proposes a modeling language and design framework for quantum circuits. This allows the definition of composite operators to advocate a higher-level quantum algorithm design, together with automated code generation for the circuit execution. To demonstrate the benefits of the proposed approach, coined Composition-based Quantum Circuit Designer , we applied it for realizing the Quantum Counting algorithm and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm. Our evaluation results show that, compared to an existing state-of-the-art editor, the proposed approach allows for the realization of both quantum algorithms on a high level with a substantially reduced development effort. In particular, the proposed approach shows constant scaling when increasing the size of the investigated quantum circuits and a lower change criticality when evolving existing quantum circuits.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Ali Shaukat, 2020, APEQS 2020: Proceedings of the 1st SIGSOFT International Workshop on Architectures and Paradigms for Engineering Quantum Software, P14, DOI 10.1145/3412451.3428499
[2]   Engineering the development of quantum programs: Application to the Boolean satisfiability problem [J].
Alonso, Diego ;
Sanchez, Pedro ;
Sanchez-Rubio, Francisco .
ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2022, 173
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Experimentation in Software Engineering
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, UML
[5]   Notational Programming for Notebook Environments: A Case Study with Quantum Circuits [J].
Arawjo, Ian ;
DeArmas, Anthony J. ;
Roberts, Michael ;
Basu, Shrutarshi ;
Parikh, Tapan .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON USER INTERFACE SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY, UIST 2022, 2022,
[6]   Grover Mixers for QAOA: Shifting Complexity from Mixer Design to State Preparation [J].
Bartschi, Andreas ;
Eidenbenz, Stephan .
IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUANTUM COMPUTING AND ENGINEERING (QCE20), 2020, :72-82
[7]   Analyzing Many-Body Localization with a Quantum Computer [J].
Bauer, Bela ;
Nayak, Chetan .
PHYSICAL REVIEW X, 2014, 4 (04)
[8]  
Beauregard S, 2003, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:quant-ph/0205095
[9]   Quantum Computing-From NISQ to PISQ [J].
Bertels, Koen ;
Sarkar, Aritra ;
Ashraf, Imran .
IEEE MICRO, 2021, 41 (05) :24-31
[10]  
Bettini L., 2016, IMPLEMENTING DOMAIN