Development of typical solar years and typical wind years for efficient assessment of renewable energy systems across the US

被引:0
作者
Zeng, Zhaoyun [1 ]
Stackhouse, Paul [2 ]
Kim, Ji-Hyun [1 ]
Muehleisen, Ralph T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Argonne Natl Lab, 9700 S Cass Ave, Lemont, IL 60439 USA
[2] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, 21 Langley Blvd MS 420, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
关键词
Weather data; Typical meteorological year; Renewable energy; Photovoltaic system; Wind turbine; NASA POWER; System advisor model; INTERANNUAL VARIABILITY; METEOROLOGICAL YEAR; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POWER; PV; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; GENERATION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124698
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Weather data plays a critical role in renewable energy analysis. Compared to using multiple Actual Meteorological Years, simulations using a single typical year require significantly fewer computational resources. Previous efforts to create typical weather datasets for renewable energy analysis either lack justified or optimized strategies for selecting and weighting different weather parameters or are limited to a few specific locations. In this study, we developed a dataset comprising Typical Solar Years (TSYs) and Typical Wind Years (TWYs) for over 2000 locations across the U.S., based on data from NASA's POWER project. The strategies for creating TSYs and TWYs were optimized based on the simulated outputs of various PV systems and wind turbines in 16 representative cities. This dataset provides an efficient means for the rapid evaluation and optimization of renewable energy systems throughout the entire U.S. Additionally, the optimal strategies identified in this study can be directly applied to create near-optimal TSYs and TWYs for most locations worldwide. However, readers can also employ the optimization approach presented in this work to develop optimal strategies tailored for particular regions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [41] Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal
    Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich
    Rogelj, Joeri
    Schaeffer, Michiel
    Lissner, Tabea
    Licker, Rachel
    Fischer, Erich M.
    Knutti, Reto
    Levermann, Anders
    Frieler, Katja
    Hare, William
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2016, 6 (09) : 827 - 835
  • [42] The National Solar Radiation Data Base (NSRDB)
    Sengupta, Manajit
    Xie, Yu
    Lopez, Anthony
    Habte, Aron
    Maclaurin, Galen
    Shelby, James
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 89 : 51 - 60
  • [43] Singh M., 2011, Tech. Rep. NREL/SR-5500-52780
  • [44] Modelling of power fluctuations from large offshore wind farms
    Sorensen, Poul
    Cutululis, Nicolaos Antonio
    Vigueras-Rodriguez, Antonio
    Madsen, Henrik
    Pinson, Pierre
    Jensen, Leo E.
    Hjerrild, Jesper
    Donovan, Martin
    [J]. WIND ENERGY, 2008, 11 (01) : 29 - 43
  • [45] Critical analysis of methods for mathematical modelling of wind turbines
    Thapar, Vinay
    Agnihotri, Gayatri
    Sethi, Vinod Krishna
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (11) : 3166 - 3177
  • [46] A cell-to-module-to-array detailed model for photovoltaic panels
    Tian, Hongmei
    Mancilla-David, Fernando
    Ellis, Kevin
    Muljadi, Eduard
    Jenkins, Peter
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2012, 86 (09) : 2695 - 2706
  • [47] Assessing climate change impacts on European wind energy from ENSEMBLES high-resolution climate projections
    Tobin, Isabelle
    Vautard, Robert
    Balog, Irena
    Breon, Francois-Marie
    Jerez, Sonia
    Ruti, Paolo Michele
    Thais, Francoise
    Vrac, Mathieu
    Yiou, Pascal
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2015, 128 (1-2) : 99 - 112
  • [48] US Census Bureau, 2022, Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMAs)
  • [49] Vignola FE, 2013, SOLAR ENERGY FORECASTING AND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT, P97
  • [50] Wagner M., 2018, No. NREL/TP- 6A20-70414