Aesthetic outcome of implants in the anterior zone after socket preservation and conventional implant placement: A retrospective study

被引：65
作者：
Rupawat D. [1 ]
Maiti S. [1 ]
Nallaswamy D. [1 ]
Sivaswamy V. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
来源：
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants | 2020年 / 30卷 / 04期
关键词：
Conventional placement; Implants; Pink aesthetic score; Socket preservation; White aesthetic score;
D O I：
10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2020035942
中图分类号：
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号：
0817 ;
摘要：
Alveolar ridge resorption occurs after tooth extraction and has the potential to either complicate implant placement or impair the final aesthetic result. Techniques to preserve natural bone and soft-tissue contours are beneficial to clinicians and patients because postextraction buccal plate resorption may have significant clinical effects, especially in the aesthetic zone. This study aims to evaluate the aesthetic outcome of implants in the anterior zone after socket preservation and conventional placement. Data were collected from a total of 86,000 patients who visited Saveetha Dental College between June 2019 and March 2020. The data of 105 patients in whom anterior implants were placed either after socket preservation or after extraction in this frame were retrieved. Pink aesthetic scoring (PES) and white aesthetic scoring (WES) were carried out, and the data obtained were tabulated in SPSS for Windows, version 20. Unpaired t-testing compared the two techniques, and Pearson chi square correlation detected potential associations with age and gender. It was found that PES and WES scores were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in implant prostheses placed after socket preservation compared to those placed after a healing period of 3 to 6 months after tooth extraction. Associations of aesthetic scores with age and gender were statistically insignificant. It was concluded that aesthetic outcomes of implants placed after socket preservation were better than those for implants conventionally placed. © 2020 by Begell House, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码：233 / 239
页数：6
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Lekovic V, Camargo PM, Klokkevold PR, Weinlaender M, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B., Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes, J Periodontol, 69, 9, pp. 1044-1049, (1998)
  • [2] Jyothi S, Robin PK, Ganapathy D, Anandiselvaraj. Periodontal health status of three different groups wearing temporary partial denture, Res J Pharm Technol, 10, 12, pp. 4339-4342, (2017)
  • [3] Ajay R, Suma K, Ali SA, Kumar Sivakumar JS, Rakshagan V, Devaki V, Divya K., Effect of surface modifications on the retention of cement-retained implant crowns under fatigue loads: An in vitro study, J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 9, pp. S154-S160, (2017)
  • [4] Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KWO, Blanchette D, Dawson DV., Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis, J Dent Res, 93, 10, pp. 950-958, (2014)
  • [5] Mello CC, Lemos CAA, Verri FR, Dos Santos DM, Goiato MC, Pellizzer EP., Immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sockets versus delayed implants into healed sockets: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 46, 9, pp. 1162-1177, (2017)
  • [6] Slagter KW, den Hartog L, Bakker NA, Vissink A, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM., Immediate placement of dental implants in the esthetic zone: A systematic review and pooled analysis, J Periodontol, 85, 7, pp. e241-e250, (2014)
  • [7] Chen H, Zhang G, Weigl P, Gu X., Immediate placement of dental implants into infected versus noninfected sites in the esthetic zone: A systematic review and meta-analysis, J Prosthet Dent, 120, 5, pp. 658-667, (2018)
  • [8] Yan Q, Xiao LQ, Su MY, Mei Y, Shi B., Soft and hard tissue changes following immediate placement or immediate restoration of single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 31, 6, pp. 1327-1340, (2016)
  • [9] Wang RE, Lang NP., Ridge preservation after tooth extraction, Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp. 147-156, (2012)
  • [10] Van der Weijden F, Dell'Acqua F, Slot DE., Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: A systematic review, J Clin Periodontol, 36, 12, pp. 1048-1058, (2009)
1234