Foci and blind spots in user experience research

被引:18
|
作者
机构
[1] Bargas-Avila, Javier
[2] Hornbæk, Kasper
来源
Bargas-Avila, J. (bargas@google.com) | 1600年 / Association for Computing Machinery卷 / 19期
关键词
Human computer interaction;
D O I
10.1145/2377783.2377790
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Javier Bargas-Avila and Kasper HornbÆk review User experience (UX) from the viewpoint of researchers and users. User experience denotes new ways of understanding and studying the quality in use of interactive products, ways that represent a reaction against usability research and traditional HCI. UX focuses also on hedonic qualities of use and much more broadly on experience. According to their study, some researchers posit that the focus of UX research should be interactive products used in everyday life, whereas other researchers are willing to apply UX methods in any domain. Many researchers emphasize that UX is heavily influenced by the context of use. The authors looked at the methods currently applied by UX researchers and found that half of the studies are qualitative (50 percent), whereas 33 percent use quantitative methods and 17 percent combine the approaches. They also found that measures of UX before interaction is rare (20 percent), while after measurements are the most frequent (70 percent).
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 27
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Model-based adaptive user interface based on context and user experience evaluation
    Hussain, Jamil
    Ul Hassan, Anees
    Bilal, Hafiz Syed Muhammad
    Ali, Rahman
    Afzal, Muhammad
    Hussain, Shujaat
    Bang, Jaehun
    Banos, Oresti
    Lee, Sungyoung
    JOURNAL ON MULTIMODAL USER INTERFACES, 2018, 12 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [32] Model-based adaptive user interface based on context and user experience evaluation
    Jamil Hussain
    Anees Ul Hassan
    Hafiz Syed Muhammad Bilal
    Rahman Ali
    Muhammad Afzal
    Shujaat Hussain
    Jaehun Bang
    Oresti Banos
    Sungyoung Lee
    Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 2018, 12 : 1 - 16
  • [33] A Taxonomy of User Behavior Model (UBM) Tools for UI Design and User Research
    Bakaev, Maxim
    Heil, Sebastian
    Jagow, Johanna
    Speicher, Maximilian
    Bauer, Kevin
    Gaedke, Martin
    WEB ENGINEERING, ICWE 2023, 2023, 13893 : 236 - 244
  • [34] The Virtual Dressing Room: A Usability and User Experience Study
    Holte, Michael B.
    Gao, Yi
    Brooks, Eva Petersson
    VIRTUAL, AUGMENTED AND MIXED REALITY (VAMR 2015), 2015, 9179 : 429 - 437
  • [35] Web Analytics for User Experience: A Systematic Literature Review
    Palomino, Fryda
    Paz, Freddy
    Moquillaza, Arturo
    DESIGN, USER EXPERIENCE, AND USABILITY: UX RESEARCH AND DESIGN, DUXU 2021, PT I, 2021, 12779 : 312 - 326
  • [36] User eXperience (UX) Evaluation in Virtual Reality (VR)
    Garcia, Matias
    Cano, Sandra
    Moreira, Fernando
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 1, WORLDCIST 2023, 2024, 799 : 207 - 215
  • [37] From doing to being: getting closer to the user experience
    Wilson, GM
    Sasse, MA
    INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 2004, 16 (04) : 697 - 705
  • [38] User Experience Evaluation on the Cryptocurrency Website by Trust Aspect
    Ramadhan, Bagus Anugrah
    Iqbal, Billy Muhamad
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT INFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES (ICIIBMS), 2018, : 274 - 279
  • [39] Theory and Design Considerations for the User Experience of Smart Environments
    Reig, Samantha
    Fong, Terrence
    Forlizzi, Jodi
    Steinfeld, Aaron
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS, 2022, 52 (03) : 522 - 535
  • [40] UsabilityZero: Can a Bad User Experience Teach Well?
    de Souza Lima, Adriano Luiz
    Vavassori Benitti, Fabiane Barreto
    INFORMATICS IN EDUCATION, 2021, 20 (01): : 69 - 84