Functional safety assessment of safety-related systems with non-perfect proof-tests

被引:0
作者
Muta, Hitoshi [1 ]
Sato, Yoshinobu [2 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo City University, Tokyo
[2] Japan Audit and Certification Organization for Environment and Quality (JACO), Tokyo
关键词
Functional safety; Non-perfect proof-test; Safety integrity level; Safety-related system;
D O I
10.1587/transfun.E97.A.1739
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The second edition of the international standard of IEC 61508, functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related system (SRS), was published in 2010. This international standard adopts a risk-based approach by which safety integrity requirements can be determined. It presents a formula to estimate the hazardous event rate taking account of non-perfect proof-tests. But it is not clear how to derive the formula. In the present paper, firstly, taking account of non-perfect proof-tests, the relationship between the dangerous undetected failure of SRS, the demand on the SRS and hazardous event is modeled by a fault tree and state-transition diagrams. Next, the hazardous event rate is formulated by use of the state-transition diagrams for the determination of the safety integrity requirements. Then, a comparison is made between the formulas obtained by this paper and given in the standard, and it is found that the latter does not always present rational formulation. Copyright © 2014 The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:1739 / 1746
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Functional Safety of Electrical/electronic/programmable Electronic Safety-related Systems, (2010)
  • [2] Misumi Y., Sato Y., Estimation of average hazardous-event-frequency for allocation of safety-integrity levels, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 66, 2, pp. 135-144, (1999)
  • [3] Knegtering B., Brombacher A.C., Application of micro Markov models for quantitative safety assessment to determine safety integrity levels as defined by the IEC 61508 standard for functional safety, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 66, 2, pp. 171-175, (1999)
  • [4] Knegteringa B., Brombacher A.C., A method to prevent excessive numbers of markov states in markov models for quantitative safety and reliability assessment, ISA Transactions, 39, pp. 363-369, (2000)
  • [5] Kawahara T., Ichitsuka A., Sato Y., State-transition model of safety-related systems with automatic diagnostic and its formulation for functional safety assessment, IEICE Trans. Fundamentals (Japanese Edition), J88-A, 8, pp. 962-973, (2003)
  • [6] Shimodaira T., Sato Y., Suyama K., Estimation of hazardous event rate for repairable 1-out-of-2 safety-related systems based on state transition models, IEICE Trans. Fundamentals (Japanese Edition), J88-A, 8, pp. 962-973, (2005)
  • [7] Guo H., Yang X., A simple reliability block diagram method for safety integrity verification, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 92, 9, pp. 1267-1273, (2007)
  • [8] Guo H., Yang X., Automatic creation of Markov models for reliability assessment of safety instrumented systems, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93, pp. 807-815, (2008)
  • [9] Kumar M., Vermab A.K., Srividya A., Modeling demand rate and imperfect proof-test and analysis of their effect on system safety, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93, pp. 1720-1729, (2008)
  • [10] Langeron Y., Barros A., Grall A., Be'Renguer C., Combination of safety integrity levels (SILs): A study of IEC61508 merging rules, J. Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 21, pp. 437-449, (2008)