Technological design of slurry manure storage and returning to farmland for fertilization on large-scale dairy farm

被引:0
|
作者
Xu P. [1 ]
Shen Y. [1 ]
Ding J. [1 ]
Meng H. [1 ]
Zhang P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Energy and Environmental Protection, Academy of Agricultural Planning and Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Technology and Model for Cyclic Utilization from Agricultural Resources, Ministry of Agricultur
关键词
Dairy farms; Farmland utilization; Manure; Storage; Technological design;
D O I
10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.21.031
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to promote the healthy development of animal husbandry, China put forward the road of green development of agriculture. The combination of planting and breeding has become an inevitable choice. The utilization of manure back to farmland is an important way of waste treatment in dairy farms. There are three types of manure, including solid, liquid, and slurry manure, which can be used as organic fertilizers. At present, returning of solid manure (after composting) and liquid manure (after storage or anaerobic fermentation) to the cropland has become the main way in dairy farms in China, while the slurry manure (after storage) is widely used in developed countries, such as Europe and America. Compared to other types of manure, the slurry manure contained higher nutrient, showing a promising application prospect in the areas with sufficient farmland. The storage technology of slurry manure has some good characteristics, such as easy collection of excrement, saving storage areas, and low treatment cost. However, only a few application cases were realized in China. In this study, the following contents were investigated for the technological design of manure storage, including the amount of collected manure wastes, parameters of storage facilities, parameters of manure utilization to farmland, costs of operation and so on, the volume of slurry manure storage facilities and the matching land areas of manure returning to farmland were given at the end. The results showed that the obvious advantages can be found in the slurry manure technology. A scaled farm with 500 dairy cattle was taken as an example, where the amount of slurry manure was 17.33 t per day. There are two types of slurry manure storage facilities, under-floor storage pit inside the breeding house and manure storage lagoon outside. The length, width, and depth of one under-floor storage pit were 85, 12 and 2 m, respectively, which can meet the storage need of slurry manure produced during 9 months. In the scaled farm with 500 dairy cattle, it needed 5 under-floor storage pits, where the total volume was 10 200 m3. The length, width, and depth of one manure storage lagoon were 90, 30 and 2.2 m, respectively, with a total volume of 5 615 m3, which can meet the storage need of slurry manure produced during 9 months. The farmland area for the application of manure was closely related to crop species and planting system. If the planting crops were wheat, harvest once a year, 248.4 hm2 of farmland was needed for manure application. If the planting crops were corn, harvest once a year, 400.6 hm2 of farmland was needed for manure application. If the planting crops were wheat and corn, harvest twice a year, 122.8 hm2 of farmland was needed for manure application. If the planting crops were rice, harvest twice a year, 127.0 hm2 of farmland was needed for manure application. The cost of all slurry manure returning to farmland was 103.7 thousand yuan, saving about 228 thousand yuan a year, compared with that of chemical fertilizers, and the annual economic benefit is 124.3 thousand yuan. The finding can provide a potential support for the application of storage technology for slurry manure. © 2020, Editorial Department of the Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 265
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Fan Bin, Xue Xiaocong, Li Meng, Et al., Production layout optimization of dairy farming in China: An empirical analysis based on comparative advantage, Research of Agricultural Modernization, 41, 2, pp. 331-340, (2020)
  • [2] Shi Zhengxiang, Wang Panliu, Zhang Li, Et al., State of dairy waste treatment and comprehensive management mode in China, Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 52, 14, pp. 62-66, (2016)
  • [3] Luo Juan, Zhao Lixin, Yao Zonglu, Et al., Construction and application of comprehensive evaluation index system for waste treatment on intensive livestock farms, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 36, 17, pp. 182-189, (2020)
  • [4] pp. 10-15
  • [5] Li Mengjiao, Dong Haixia, Guo Jiangpeng, The environment policy and manure treatment models of large-scale milk cows breeding in US, Ecological Economy, 30, 7, pp. 55-59, (2014)
  • [6] Perazzolo F, Mattachini G, Tambone F, Et al., Nutrient losses from cattle co-digestate slurry during storage, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 47, 2, pp. 94-99, (2016)
  • [7] Dinuccio E, Berg W, Balsari P., Effects of mechanical separation on GHG and ammonia emissions from cattle slurry under winter conditions, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166, pp. 532-538, (2011)
  • [8] Mei Ying, Wei Kunhao, Cui Naqi, Et al., Nitrogen distribution and ammonia emission characteristics in different livestock manure treatment processes in intensive dairy farms, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 34, 18, pp. 261-267, (2018)
  • [9] Dinuccio E, Gioelli F, Balsari P, Et al., Ammonia losses from the storage and application of raw and chemo-mechanically separated slurry, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 153, pp. 16-23, (2012)
  • [10] Xu Pengxiang, Shen Yujun, Ding Jingtao, Et al., Slurry manure collection and design of storage system on scaled pig farms, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 36, 9, pp. 255-262, (2020)