Stochasting modeling of virus transport and removal during aquifer storage and recovery

被引:0
|
作者
Torkzaban S. [1 ,2 ]
Hocking M. [1 ]
Bradford S.A. [3 ]
Tazehkand S.S. [1 ,2 ]
Sasidharan S. [3 ,4 ]
Šimůnek J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Geological Survey of Victoria, PO Box 500, Melbourne, 3002, Victoria
[2] National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5001, SA
[3] US Salinity Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Riverside, CA
[4] Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA
关键词
Aquifer storage and recovery (ASR); Heterogeneous aquifers; Virus attachment; detachment; and inactivation;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124082
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A quantitative understanding of virus removal during aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) in physically and geochemically heterogeneous aquifers is needed to accurately assess human health risks from viral infections. A two-dimensional axisymmetric numerical model incorporating processes of virus attachment, detachment, and inactivation in aqueous and solid phases was developed to systematically evaluate the virus removal performance of ASR schemes. Physical heterogeneity was considered as either layered or randomly distributed hydraulic conductivities (with selected variance and horizontal correlation length). Geochemical heterogeneity in the aquifer was accounted for using Colloid Filtration Theory to predict the spatial distribution of attachment rate coefficient. Simulation results demonstrate that the combined effects of aquifer physical heterogeneity and spatial variability of attachment rate resulted in higher virus concentrations in the recovered water at the ASR well (i.e. reduced virus removal). While the sticking efficiency of viruses to aquifer sediments was found to significantly influence virus concentration in the recovered water, the solid phase inactivation under realistic field conditions combined with the duration of storage phase had a predominant influence on the overall virus removal. The relative importance of physical heterogeneity increased under physicochemical conditions that reduced virus removal (e.g. lower value of sticking efficiency or solid phase inactivation rate). This study provides valuable insight on site selection of ASR projects and an approach to optimize ASR operational parameters (e.g. storage time) for virus removal and to minimize costs associated with post-recovery treatment. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reactive transport modeling of an aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) pilot to assess long-term water quality improvements and potential solutions
    Antoniou, E. A.
    Stuyfzand, P. J.
    van Breukelen, B. M.
    APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 35 : 173 - 186
  • [32] Geochemical modelling of fluoride concentration changes during Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) in the Chalk aquifer in Wessex, England
    Gaus, I
    Shand, P
    Gale, IN
    Williams, AT
    Eastwood, JC
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY, 2002, 35 : 203 - 208
  • [33] Aquifer pre-oxidation using permanganate to mitigate water quality deterioration during aquifer storage and recovery
    Antoniou, E. A.
    Hartog, N.
    van Breukelen, B. M.
    Stuyfzand, P. J.
    APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2014, 50 : 25 - 36
  • [34] Modeling aquifer storage and recovery potential for seasonal water storage in the Flemish alluvial plains of Belgium using MODFLOW
    Wasif, Mohammad Rashed
    Hasan, Mohammad Mehedi
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 13 (05)
  • [35] Modeling aquifer storage and recovery potential for seasonal water storage in the Flemish alluvial plains of Belgium using MODFLOW
    Mohammad Rashed Wasif
    Mohammad Mehedi Hasan
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2020, 13
  • [36] Study of the feasibility of an aquifer storage and recovery system in a deep aquifer in Belgium
    Vandenbohede, Alexander
    Van Houtte, Emmanuel
    Lebbe, Luc
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2008, 53 (04): : 844 - 856
  • [37] Hydraulic Fracturing of the Floridan Aquifer from Aquifer Storage and Recovery Operations
    Geibel, Nicholas M.
    Brown, Christopher J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING GEOSCIENCE, 2012, 18 (02): : 175 - 189
  • [38] EXAMINING THE IMPACT OF AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY ON DBPS
    SINGER, PC
    PYNE, RDG
    AVS, M
    MILLER, CT
    MOJONNIER, C
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 1993, 85 (11): : 85 - 94
  • [39] Virus transport experiments in a sandy aquifer
    Corapcioglu, M
    Vogel, J
    Munster, C
    Pillai, S
    Dowd, S
    Wang, S
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2006, 169 (1-4): : 47 - 65
  • [40] Control of saltwater intrusion by aquifer storage and recovery
    Hussain, Mohammed S.
    Javadi, Akbar A.
    Sherif, Mohsen M.
    Naseri-Karim-Vand, Reza
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING AND COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2016, 169 (03) : 148 - 155