Stochasting modeling of virus transport and removal during aquifer storage and recovery

被引:0
|
作者
Torkzaban S. [1 ,2 ]
Hocking M. [1 ]
Bradford S.A. [3 ]
Tazehkand S.S. [1 ,2 ]
Sasidharan S. [3 ,4 ]
Šimůnek J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Geological Survey of Victoria, PO Box 500, Melbourne, 3002, Victoria
[2] National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5001, SA
[3] US Salinity Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Riverside, CA
[4] Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA
关键词
Aquifer storage and recovery (ASR); Heterogeneous aquifers; Virus attachment; detachment; and inactivation;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124082
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A quantitative understanding of virus removal during aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) in physically and geochemically heterogeneous aquifers is needed to accurately assess human health risks from viral infections. A two-dimensional axisymmetric numerical model incorporating processes of virus attachment, detachment, and inactivation in aqueous and solid phases was developed to systematically evaluate the virus removal performance of ASR schemes. Physical heterogeneity was considered as either layered or randomly distributed hydraulic conductivities (with selected variance and horizontal correlation length). Geochemical heterogeneity in the aquifer was accounted for using Colloid Filtration Theory to predict the spatial distribution of attachment rate coefficient. Simulation results demonstrate that the combined effects of aquifer physical heterogeneity and spatial variability of attachment rate resulted in higher virus concentrations in the recovered water at the ASR well (i.e. reduced virus removal). While the sticking efficiency of viruses to aquifer sediments was found to significantly influence virus concentration in the recovered water, the solid phase inactivation under realistic field conditions combined with the duration of storage phase had a predominant influence on the overall virus removal. The relative importance of physical heterogeneity increased under physicochemical conditions that reduced virus removal (e.g. lower value of sticking efficiency or solid phase inactivation rate). This study provides valuable insight on site selection of ASR projects and an approach to optimize ASR operational parameters (e.g. storage time) for virus removal and to minimize costs associated with post-recovery treatment. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeling Virus Transport and Removal during Storage and Recovery in Heterogeneous Aquifers
    Torkzaban, Saeed
    Hocking, Mark
    Bradford, Scott A.
    Tazehkand, Sara S.
    Sasidharan, Salini
    Simunek, Jiri
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 578
  • [2] Nutrient Removal during Stormwater Aquifer Storage and Recovery in an Anoxic Carbonate Aquifer
    Vanderzalm, Joanne L.
    Page, Declan W.
    Dillon, Peter J.
    Barry, Karen E.
    Gonzalez, Dennis
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2018, 47 (02) : 276 - 286
  • [3] Optimizing aquifer storage and recovery performance through reactive transport modeling
    Antoniou, E. A.
    van Breukelen, B. M.
    Stuyfzand, P. J.
    APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2015, 61 : 29 - 40
  • [4] VIRUS TRANSPORT AND REMOVAL IN WASTE-WATER DURING AQUIFER RECHARGE
    POWELSON, DK
    GERBA, CP
    YAHYA, MT
    WATER RESEARCH, 1993, 27 (04) : 583 - 590
  • [5] Biodegradation of disinfection byproducts as a potential removal process during aquifer storage recovery
    Landmeyer, JE
    Bradley, PM
    Thomas, JM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2000, 36 (04): : 861 - 867
  • [6] Water quality changes during aquifer storage and recovery: Quantification of water-sediment interactions and reactive transport modeling
    Descourvieres, Carlos
    Prommer, Henning
    Oldham, Carolyn
    Greskowiak, Janek
    Environmental Science and Development, 2011, 4 : 19 - 23
  • [7] Aquifer Storage and Recovery
    Pillar, T.
    Water, 24 (01):
  • [8] The arsenic problem during Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR)
    Pichler, T
    Arthur, JD
    Price, RE
    Jones, GW
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2004, 68 (11) : A520 - A520
  • [9] Arsenic Control During Aquifer Storage Recovery Cycle Tests in the Floridan Aquifer
    Mirecki, June E.
    Bennett, Michael W.
    Lopez-Balaez, Marie C.
    GROUND WATER, 2013, 51 (04) : 539 - 549
  • [10] Solute changes during aquifer storage recovery testing in a limestone clastic aquifer
    Mirecki, JE
    Campbell, BG
    Conlon, KJ
    Petkewich, MD
    GROUND WATER, 1998, 36 (03) : 394 - 403