Comparison of Carbon Emissions from Traditional Treatment and Source Separation Treatment of Rural Domestic Sewage

被引：0
作者：
Cao, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Li [1 ,2 ]
Du, Zi-Wen [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Li-Qiu [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Beijing Key Laboratory for Source Control Technology of Water Pollution, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing
[2] Engineering Research Center for Water Pollution Source Control & Eco-remediation, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing
来源：
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science | 2024年 / 45卷 / 08期
关键词：
carbon compensation; carbon emission calculation; land use; rural domestic sewage; source separation;
D O I：
10.13227/j.hjkx.202309166
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Based on the carbon emission accounting method for domestic sewage，combined with the current situation of rural domestic sewage treatment，the carbon emissions of traditional schemes and source separation schemes under the three scenarios of single household，multi-household，and pipeline treatments were calculated. The results showed that the net carbon emissions（calculated as CO2）of the single household，multi-household，and pipeline treatment traditional schemes were 1.21，3.37，and 2.69 kg·m-3，respectively. The net carbon emissions（calculated as CO2）of the single household，multi-household，and pipeline treatments in source separation schemes were -0.50，-0.04，and -0.54 kg·m-3，respectively，achieving zero or even negative carbon emissions. The direct and indirect carbon emissions of the source separation scheme were lower than those of the traditional scheme under all three scenarios. The carbon compensation measures in the source separation scheme mainly came from the land use of urine after storage and treatment. By separating blackwater from graywater at the source，the Source Separation Program achieved resource utilization of highly concentrated pollutants in blackwater，reducing emissions while generating significant carbon offsets. Therefore，efforts should be made to promote the separation and treatment of rural domestic sewage sources，improve the utilization rate of rural domestic sewage resources，and achieve green and low-carbon development of rural domestic sewage treatment. © 2024 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：4648 / 4655
页数：7
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [21] Li Z K, Zhang L Q, Du Z W，, Et al., Comparison of carbon emissions in different treatment and disposal process routes of municipal sludge［J］, Environmental Science, 44, 2, pp. 1181-1190, (2023)
  • [22] The evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions from sewage treatment with urbanization：Understanding the opportunities and challenges for climate change mitigation in China’s low-carbon pilot city，Shenzhen［J］, Science of the Total Environment, (2023)
  • [23] Meng H Q, Li H X, Zhao A P，, Et al., Systematic evaluation of low-carbon operation of typical A<sup>2</sup>O processes in municipal sewage plant ［J］, Environmental Science, 44, 2, pp. 1174-1180, (2023)
  • [24] Hao X D, Yang W Y, Lin J., Non negligible carbon emission with methane from septic tanks［J］, China Water & Wastewater, 33, 10, pp. 28-33, (2017)
  • [25] Wang J H, Zhang J，, Xie H J，, Et al., Methane emissions from a full-scale A/A/O wastewater treatment plant ［J］, Bioresource Technology, 102, 9, pp. 5479-5485, (2011)
  • [26] (2011)
  • [27] Cai B F, Gao Q X, Li Z H，, Et al., Study on the methane emission factors of wastewater treatment plants in China ［J］, China Population，Resources and Environment, 25, 4, pp. 118-124, (2015)
  • [28] Kosonen H，, Heinonen M，, Mikola A，, Et al., Nitrous oxide production at a fully covered wastewater treatment plant：results of a long-term online monitoring campaign［J］, Environmental Science & Technology, 50, 11, pp. 5547-5554, (2016)
  • [29] Andersen J K，, Boldrin A，, Christensen T H，, Et al., Home composting as an alternative treatment option for organic household waste in Denmark：an environmental assessment using life cycle assessment-modelling［J］, Waste Management, 32, 1, pp. 31-40, (2012)
  • [30] IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories ［EB/OL］, (2006)
12345