Effect of zeolite type in sorption-enhanced CO2 hydrogenation to methanol

被引:0
|
作者
Heracleous, Eleni [1 ,2 ]
Koidi, Vasiliki [1 ,2 ]
Lappas, Angelos A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chemical Process & Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi, Thessaloniki,57001, Greece
[2] School of Science and Technology, International Hellenic University, 14th km Thessaloniki -Nea Moudania, Thessaloniki,57001, Greece
关键词
Adsorption;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2024.157846
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The use of solid adsorbents for in-situ water removal can overcome thermodynamic constraints that limit CO2-derived methanol production to low levels. In this work, the water and methanol adsorption/desorption capacity and kinetics of four different zeolites (LTA-3A, LTA-4A, LTA-5A and FAU-13X) are investigated in a thermogravimetric setup equipped with a mass spectrometer. When water is replaced with methanol, the sorption kinetics are faster, the capacity is larger and the differences between the sorbents are more prominent. Co-adsorption is also evidenced on all zeolites. Use of the sorbents as admixtures with a commercial CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst in sorption-enhanced CO2 hydrogenation experiments at 250 °C and 70 bar increases CO2 conversion by 48–56 % and CH3OH yield by 63–70 %. Zeolites 4A and 13X demonstrate the highest performance improvement and 3A the lowest, while zeolite 5A leads to significant enhancement in methanol selectivity in agreement with the adsorption studies. Preferential methanol enhancement occurs due to the simultaneous sorption of methanol along with water. The stability, evaluated over consecutive cycles at the employed reaction-regeneration conditions, showcases zeolite 4A as the most stable adsorbent and zeolite 13X the least, in line with N2 adsorption/desorption and XRD observations. © 2024 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance optimization of sorption-enhanced DME synthesis (SEDMES) from captured CO2 and renewable hydrogen
    Tyraskis, I.
    Capa, A.
    Skorikova, G.
    Sluijter, S. N.
    Boon, J.
    FRONTIERS IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 7
  • [32] Sorption-enhanced chemical looping steam reforming of glycerol with CO2 in-situ capture and utilization
    Dou, Binlin
    Wu, Kai
    Zhang, Hua
    Chen, Bingbing
    Chen, Haisheng
    Xu, Yujie
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 452 (452)
  • [33] Sorption-enhanced thin film composites with metal-organic polyhedral nanocages for CO2 separation
    Sohail, Muhammad
    An, Heseong
    Choi, Wanuk
    Singh, Jatinder
    Yim, Kanghoon
    Kim, Byung-Hyun
    Park, Young Cheol
    Lee, Jong Suk
    Kim, Hyunuk
    Journal of Membrane Science, 2021, 620
  • [34] Catalytic systems for hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol
    Tedeeva, Marina A.
    Kustov, Alexander L.
    Batkin, Alexander M.
    Garifullina, Cholpan
    Zalyatdinov, Albert A.
    Yang, Dan
    Dai, Yihu
    Yang, Yanhui
    Kustov, Leonid M.
    MOLECULAR CATALYSIS, 2024, 566
  • [36] CO2 hydrogenation to methanol by organometallic catalysts
    Onishi, Naoya
    Himeda, Yuichiro
    CHEM CATALYSIS, 2022, 2 (02): : 242 - 252
  • [37] Methanol Synthesis from CO2 Hydrogenation
    Bowker, Michael
    CHEMCATCHEM, 2019, 11 (17) : 4238 - 4246
  • [38] Catalytic Hydrogenation of CO2 to Methanol: A Review
    Ren, Menghao
    Zhang, Yanmin
    Wang, Xuan
    Qiu, Hengshan
    CATALYSTS, 2022, 12 (04)
  • [39] Zeolite-encaged mononuclear copper centers catalyze CO2 selective hydrogenation to methanol
    Chai, Yuchao
    Qin, Bin
    Li, Bonan
    Dai, Weili
    Wu, Guangjun
    Guan, Naijia
    Li, Landong
    NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2023, 10 (07)
  • [40] Effect of the Cu/Ni Ratio on the Activity of Zeolite Based Cu–Ni Bimetallic Catalysts for CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol
    Abdulrahman I. Alharthi
    Israf Ud Din
    Mshari A. Alotaibi
    Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2020, 94 : 2563 - 2568