LiDAR-Based Modeling of Individual Tree Height to Crown Base in Picea crassifolia Kom. in Northern China: Comparing Bayesian, Gaussian Process, and Random Forest Approaches

被引:1
作者
Yang, Zhaohui [1 ]
Yang, Hao [1 ]
Zhou, Zeyu [2 ]
Wan, Xiangxing [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Huiru [2 ]
Duan, Guangshuang [5 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Agr Univ, Sch Forestry, Taiyuan 030031, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Forestry, Expt Ctr Forestry North China, Beijing 102300, Peoples R China
[3] China Aero Geophys Survey & Remote Sensing Ctr Nat, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[4] Minist Nat Resources, Key Lab Airborne Geophys & Remote Sensing Geol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[5] Xinyang Normal Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Xinyang 464000, Peoples R China
关键词
height to crown base; LiDAR; hierarchical Bayesian model; Gaussian process regression; Picea crassifolia Kom; STAND DENSITY; PINE STANDS; RATIO; UNCERTAINTY; GROWTH; TAPER; CARBON; SIZE;
D O I
10.3390/f15111940
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
This study compared hierarchical Bayesian, mixed-effects Gaussian process regression, and random forest models for predicting height to crown base (HCB) in Qinghai spruce (Picea crassifolia Kom.) forests using LiDAR-derived data. Both modeling approaches were applied to a dataset of 510 trees from 16 plots in northern China. The models incorporated tree-level variables (height, diameter at breast height, crown projection area) and plot-level spatial competition indices. Model performance was evaluated using leave-one-plot-out cross-validation. The Gaussian mixed-effects process model (with an RMSE of 1.59 and MAE of 1.25) slightly outperformed the hierarchical Bayesian model and the random forest model. Both models identified LiDAR-derived tree height, DBH, and LiDAR-derived crown projection area as primary factors influencing HCB. The spatial competition index (SCI) emerged as the most effective random effect, with the lowest AIC and BIC values, highlighting the importance of local competition dynamics in HCB formation. Uncertainty analysis revealed consistent patterns across the predicted values, with an average relative uncertainty of 33.89% for the Gaussian process model. These findings provide valuable insights for forest management and suggest that incorporating spatial competition indices can enhance HCB predictions.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments [J].
Agee, JK ;
Skinner, CN .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 211 (1-2) :83-96
[2]   Estimating forest canopy fuel parameters using LIDAR data [J].
Andersen, HE ;
McGaughey, RJ ;
Reutebuch, SE .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 94 (04) :441-449
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Arm: data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models
[4]   Processing of laser scanner data - algorithms and applications [J].
Axelsson, PE .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 54 (2-3) :138-147
[5]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[6]   A Survey on Gaussian Processes for Earth-Observation Data Analysis A comprehensive investigation [J].
Camps-Valls, Gustau ;
Verrelst, Jochem ;
Munoz-Mari, Jordi ;
Laparra, Valero ;
Mateo-Jimenez, Fernando ;
Gomez-Dan, Jose .
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING MAGAZINE, 2016, 4 (02) :58-78
[7]  
Chu W, 2005, J MACH LEARN RES, V6, P1019
[8]  
Clark JS, 2003, ECOLOGY, V84, P1370, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1370:UAVIDA]2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   DISTANCE TO NEAREST NEIGHBOR AS A MEASURE OF SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS IN POPULATIONS [J].
CLARK, PJ ;
EVANS, FC .
ECOLOGY, 1954, 35 (04) :445-453