Experimental and numerical simulation of seismic behavior of reinforced concrete frames infilled with refractory straw blocks

Recent earthquakes have highlighted the vulnerability of infilled reinforced concrete structures due to the insufficient consideration of infill masonry walls' contribution to strength and stiffness. This study presents a novel refractory straw block (RSB) designed to address these challenges and improve the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) frames. Unlike traditional infills, RSB is characterized by low-elastic-modulus, lowdensity, and high-ductility. Quasi-static tests were performed on three types of frames: unfilled, infilled hollow grouted bricks (HGB), and infilled RSBs. Failure model, stiffness, and load-displacement response of three specimens were investigated and analyzed. The results indicate that RSBs as infill material does not alter the failure mode and constitutive relationship of bare frame, while HGBs leads to shear failure. The peak load for the specimen IF-HGB was 69.3 kN at 1.1 % drift, compared to 38.8 kN at 2.4 % drift for the specimen IF-RSB, and 36.4 kN at 2.0 % drift for the specimen BF. The strengths of specimens IF-HGB and IF-RSB were 1.90 and 1.07 times that of specimen BF, respectively. The stiffness of specimen IF-HGB was 3.7 times that of the other specimens, but its allowable displacement was only 61 % of theirs. Dynamic time-history analyses were also performed on structures with no longitudinal infill (BF), with RSBs (SBF), and with fired bricks (FBF). At the design level of rare events (magnitude 8, PGA 400 gal), severe damage occurred, but collapse was limited. When the PGA increased further, the collapse probability of model FBF rose rapidly, whereas the collapse probabilities of models SBF and BF remained low and similar. Accounting for the confining effect of walls, model FBF showed a higher probability of severe damage than models SBF and BF, particularly under minor earthquakes. The maximum inter-storey drift ratio of the model SBF and FBF were respectively 1.2 times and 1.7 times that of the model BF, which shows that straw blocks as infill can greatly avoid the effect of infill on the seismic behavior of the structure. The study also emphasized the often-overlooked confining effect of masonry on columns, which can lead to unrealistic damage assessments and seismic shear force distributions.