The Evolution Of Methods For The Survey And Analysis Of Rock Slopes: A Review

被引：2

作者：

Francioni M. ^{[1
]}

Calamita F. ^{[2
]}

Sciarra N. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] University of Urbino, Department of Pure and Applied Sciences, Via Aurelio Saffi,2, Urbino

[2] University “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, Department of Engineering and Geology, Via dei Vestini,31, Chieti

来源：

Italian Journal of Engineering Geology and Environment | 2021年 / SpecialIssue1期

关键词：

cost-benefit analysis; engineering rock mass characterization; remote sensing; rockfall; smartphone application;

D O I：

10.4408/IJEGE.2021-01.S-08

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Rockfalls are a major hazard for human activities, especially in proximity of infrastructures. The steps in the analysis of rockfalls may include: i) the survey and characterization of rock outcrops, ii) the kinematic assessment and engineering classification of rock masses, ii) stability analysis and rockfall simulations. This research aims to present a toolbox for rockfall hazard studies and risk mitigation. The toolbox has been created combining the existing methods of survey and analysis and new and innovative techniques developed during this project. In particular, the survey techniques that have been analyzed are: i) conventional geomechanical survey, ii) reflex camera-based terrestrial photogrammetry, iii) recently developed Smartphone-based terrestrial photogrammetry and iv) UAV-based photogrammetry. Once evaluated such methods of survey, we discuss the use of gathered data for engineering rock mass classifications and rockfall analyses. The toolbox can represent an innovative and important step in engineering rock slope analyses, allowing to understand advantages and limitations of each survey/analysis technique, not only related to the quality of data and results, but also considering other important aspects, such as the cost, the time of survey and post-processing and the complexity of survey and data management. © Sapienza Università Editrice

引用

页码：87 / 95

页数：8

共 23 条

[1]

BAR N., BARTON N., The Q-Slope method for rock slope engineering, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 50, 12, pp. 3307-3322, (2017)

[2]

BARTON N., GRIMSTAD E., Tunnel and cavern support selection in Norway, based on rock mass classification with the Q-system, Norwegian Tunnelling Society, 23, pp. 45-77, (2014)

[3]

BIENIAwSKI Z.T., Engineering Rock Mass Classifications, (1989)

[4]

BIRCH J.S., Using 3DM Analyst mine mapping suite for rock face characterization, Laser and Photogrammetric Methods for Rock Face Characterization, 2006, pp. 13-32, (2006)

[5]

DE STEFANO R., REPOLA L., GUERRIERO L., IOvANE D., MORRA V., PAgANO F., DI MARTIRE D., Rockfall threatening cumae archeological site fruition (Phlegraean fields park—Naples), Sustainability (Switzerland), 13, 3, pp. 1-15, (2021)

[6]

DONATI D., STEAD D., GHIROTTI M., BRIDEAU M-A., A model-oriented, remote sensing approach for the derivation of numerical modelling input data: Insights from the Hope Slide, Canada, Proc. ISRM International Symposium ‘Rock Mechanics for Africa’ AfriRock Conference 2017, (2017)

[7]

FRANCIONI M., SALvINI R., STEAD D., COggAN J.J., Improvements in the integration of remote sensing and rock slope modelling, Natural Hazards, 90, pp. 975-1004, (2018)

[8]

FRANCIONI M., SIMONE M., STEAD D., SCIARRA N., MATALONI G., CALAMITA F., A new fast and low-cost photogrammetry method for the engineering characterization of rock slopes, Remote Sensing, 11, 11, (2019)

[9]

FRANCIONI M., STEAD D., SCIARRA N., CALAMITA F., A new approach for defining Slope Mass Rating in heterogeneous sedimentary rocks using a combined remote sensing GIS approach, B. Eng. Geol. Environ, (2019)

[10]

FRANCIONI M., AnTONACI F., SCIARRA N., ROBIATI C., COggAN J., STEAD D., CALAMITA F., Application of unmanned aerial vehicle data and discrete fracture network models for improved rockfall simulations, Remote Sens, 12, 12, (2020)

← 1 2 3 →