Relationship between CO2 Emissions from Concrete Production and Economic Growth in 20 OECD Countries

被引:0
作者
Dobrucali, Esra [1 ]
机构
[1] Sakarya Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-54050 Sakarya, Turkiye
关键词
construction sector; sustainability; concrete; CO2; emissions; decoupling; OECD countries; CARBON EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE-GAS; CONSTRUCTION; ENERGY; SUSTAINABILITY; FOOTPRINT; WOOD;
D O I
10.3390/buildings14092709
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Many production activities contribute to environmental degradation by emitting greenhouse gases. The construction sector, one of the main sectors contributing to a country's economic growth, also contributes to greenhouse gas emissions (especially CO2). Concrete, one of the most commonly used materials in this sector, is a source of CO2 emissions due to its cement content. The purpose of this article is to examine the decoupling status between environmental degradation caused by CO2 emissions from ready-mixed concrete production and the economic growth of 20 OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries. This study consists of four stages and three periods. In the first stage, the variables are selected; in the second stage, the data are created; and in the third stage, data analysis is performed. In the final stage, the type of decoupling between economic growth and environmental degradation is separately determined for 20 OECD countries. These stages were completed for the pre-commitment period (2000-2007) of the Kyoto Protocol, the first commitment period (2008-2012), and the second commitment period (2013-2019). According to our findings, during the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, only Switzerland and Belgium achieved absolute decoupling between the environmental degradation caused by CO2 emissions from concrete production and economic growth.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2023, About us
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, Future State 2030: The Global Megatrends and Shaping Governments
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev, V23, P401, DOI [10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00044-1, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00044-1]
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2023, WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing
  • [6] Building energy performance: A LCA case study of kenaf-fibres insulation board
    Ardente, Fulvio
    Beccali, Marco
    Cellura, Maurizio
    Mistretta, Marina
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2008, 40 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [7] Applicability of the environmental Kuznets curve to construction waste management: A panel analysis of 27 European economies
    Bao, Zhikang
    Lu, Weisheng
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2023, 188
  • [8] Examining the carbon agenda via the 40% House scenario
    Boardman, Brenda
    [J]. BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2007, 35 (04) : 363 - 378
  • [9] Bodur S, 2021, SIGMA J ENG NAT SCI, V39, P29
  • [10] A Study of the Decoupling of Economic Growth from CO2 and HFCs Emissions in the EU27 Countries
    Cautisanu, Cristina
    Hatmanu, Mariana
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (14)