Classification and Mapping of Fuels in Mediterranean Forest Landscapes Using a UAV-LiDAR System and Integration Possibilities with Handheld Mobile Laser Scanner Systems

被引:3
作者
Hoffren, Raul [1 ,2 ]
Lamelas, Maria Teresa [2 ,3 ]
de la Riva, Juan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Geog & Land Management, Calle Pedro Cerbuna 12, Zaragoza 50009, Spain
[2] Univ Zaragoza, Univ Inst Res Environm Sci Aragon IUCA, Geoforest Grp, Calle Pedro Cerbuna 12, Zaragoza 50009, Spain
[3] Acad Gen Mil, Ctr Univ Def, Ctra Huesca S-N, Zaragoza 50090, Spain
关键词
proximal remote sensing; unmanned aerial vehicles; HMLS; machine learning; wildfires; forest management; MODELS; COMMUNITIES; WILDFIRES;
D O I
10.3390/rs16183536
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, we evaluated the capability of an unmanned aerial vehicle with a LiDAR sensor (UAV-LiDAR) to classify and map fuel types based on the Prometheus classification in Mediterranean environments. UAV data were collected across 73 forest plots located in NE of Spain. Furthermore, data collected from a handheld mobile laser scanner system (HMLS) in 43 out of the 73 plots were used to assess the extent of improvement in fuel identification resulting from the fusion of UAV and HMLS data. UAV three-dimensional point clouds (average density: 452 points/m2) allowed the generation of LiDAR metrics and indices related to vegetation structure. Additionally, voxels of 5 cm3 derived from HMLS three-dimensional point clouds (average density: 63,148 points/m2) facilitated the calculation of fuel volume at each Prometheus fuel type height stratum (0.60, 2, and 4 m). Two different models based on three machine learning techniques (Random Forest, Linear Support Vector Machine, and Radial Support Vector Machine) were employed to classify the fuel types: one including only UAV variables and the other incorporating HMLS volume data. The most relevant UAV variables introduced into the classification models, according to Dunn's test, were the 99th and 10th percentile of the vegetation heights, the standard deviation of the heights, the total returns above 4 m, and the LiDAR Height Diversity Index (LHDI). The best classification using only UAV data was achieved with Random Forest (overall accuracy = 81.28%), with confusion mainly found between similar shrub and tree fuel types. The integration of fuel volume from HMLS data yielded a substantial improvement, especially in Random Forest (overall accuracy = 95.05%). The mapping of the UAV model correctly estimated the fuel types in the total area of 55 plots and at least part of the area of 59 plots. These results confirm that UAV-LiDAR systems are valid and operational tools for forest fuel classification and mapping and show how fusion with HMLS data refines the identification of fuel types, contributing to more effective management of forest ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Global Emergence of Anthropogenic Climate Change in Fire Weather Indices [J].
Abatzoglou, John T. ;
Williams, A. Park ;
Barbero, Renaud .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 46 (01) :326-336
[2]   Forest fuel type classification: Review of remote sensing techniques, constraints and future trends [J].
Abdollahi, Arnick ;
Yebra, Marta .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 342
[3]   Connections of climate change and variability to large and extreme forest fires in southeast Australia [J].
Abram, Nerilie J. ;
Henley, Benjamin J. ;
Sen Gupta, Alex ;
Lippmann, Tanya J. R. ;
Clarke, Hamish ;
Dowdy, Andrew J. ;
Sharples, Jason J. ;
Nolan, Rachael H. ;
Zhang, Tianran ;
Wooster, Martin J. ;
Wurtzel, Jennifer B. ;
Meissner, Katrin J. ;
Pitman, Andrew J. ;
Ukkola, Anna M. ;
Murphy, Brett P. ;
Tapper, Nigel J. ;
Boer, Matthias M. .
COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 2 (01)
[4]   A Multimodal Data Fusion and Deep Learning Framework for Large-Scale Wildfire Surface Fuel Mapping [J].
Alipour, Mohamad ;
La Puma, Inga ;
Picotte, Joshua ;
Shamsaei, Kasra ;
Rowell, Eric ;
Watts, Adam ;
Kosovic, Branko ;
Ebrahimian, Hamed ;
Taciroglu, Ertugrul .
FIRE-SWITZERLAND, 2023, 6 (02)
[5]   Mapping lightning/human-caused wildfires occurrence under ignition point location uncertainty [J].
Amatulli, Giuseppe ;
Perez-Cabello, Fernando ;
de la Riva, Juan .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 200 (3-4) :321-333
[6]   Estimating forest canopy fuel parameters using LIDAR data [J].
Andersen, HE ;
McGaughey, RJ ;
Reutebuch, SE .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 94 (04) :441-449
[7]   Generation and Mapping of Fuel Types for Fire Risk Assessment [J].
Aragoneses, Elena ;
Chuvieco, Emilio .
FIRE-SWITZERLAND, 2021, 4 (03)
[8]   Potential of Sentinel-2A Data to Model Surface and Canopy Fuel Characteristics in Relation to Crown Fire Hazard [J].
Arellano-Perez, Stefano ;
Castedo-Dorado, Fernando ;
Antonio Lopez-Sanchez, Carlos ;
Gonzalez-Ferreiro, Eduardo ;
Yang, Zhiqiang ;
Alberto Diaz-Varela, Ramon ;
Gabriel Alvarez-Gonzalez, Juan ;
Antonio Vega, Jose ;
Daria Ruiz-Gonzalez, Ana .
REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (10)
[9]  
Ascoli Davide, 2021, Annals of Silvicultural Research, V46, P177, DOI 10.12899/asr-2264
[10]   Predicting Southeastern Forest Canopy Heights and Fire Fuel Models using GLAS Data [J].
Ashworth, Andrew ;
Evans, David L. ;
Cooke, William H. ;
Londo, Andrew ;
Collins, Curtis ;
Neuenschwander, Amy .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 76 (08) :915-922