The railway operation process evaluation method in terms of resilience analysis

被引:0
作者
RESTEL F.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw University of Science and Technology Discipline of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Technical Systems Operation and Maintenance
来源
Archives of Transport | 2021年 / 57卷 / 01期
关键词
Fuzzy Logic; Performance; Railway; Resilience;
D O I
10.5604/01.3001.0014.7485
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In complex socio-technical systems there is an influence of safe unwanted events on the occurrence of accidents. It is like domino bricks. Therefore, it is not only the recovery from major events that is important, but also the recovery from dis-ruptions in operation. As the literature review shows, the recovery of operation processes is analysed by single criterions for small disruptions. On the other hand, resilience research is focused on the network and major events, but not on frequent small-consequence events that affect operational processes. The performance of a system is a key parameter when evalu-ating resilience. As a result of the performed literature survey, the aim of the paper was to propose a new method for evaluating performance in terms of operational processes and resilience analysis. Moreover, it is also important to order the most important terms related to this issue, as well as to introduce new types of qualities, which are not only focused on the system, but also on the implemented operational processes. The paper consists of eight sections. The introduction section describes generally the problem, that leads to formulation of the aim of the paper and description of its structure. It is followed by the second section consisting of a complex literature survey. Section three orders the reliability, robustness and resilience definitions. Section four analyses the performance influencing factors using Fault and Event Tree Analysis, while section five defines the operational layer of the system and shows a formal description of operation processes. Section six presents the operation process evaluation model. It was elaborated using the Fuzzy Logic approach, that allows combining of incoherent system and process qualities: Punctuality, probability no further delays, quantitative implementation of scheduled processes, reconfiguration level. Afterwards a case study is shown to present the method application. The performed case study shows the advantages of the proposed ap-proach, which is related to the most common methods. The paper ends with conclusions and further research perspectives. © 2021 Warsaw University of Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 89
页数:16
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] AL KHALED A., JIN M., LI L., Eval-uating Criticality of Railway Links Based on Freight Flow Network Optimization, IIE An-nual Conference. Proceedings, 2011, pp. 1-8, (2011)
  • [2] ALIPOUR A., SHAFEI B., Seismic Re-silience of Transportation Networks with Dete-riorating Components, Journal of Structural Engineering, 142, (2016)
  • [3] ANDERSSON ET AL., ANDERSSON E.V., PETERSON A, TORNQUIST KRASE-MANN J., Quantifying railway timeta-ble robustness in critical points, Journal of Rail Transport Planning and Management, 3, 3, pp. 95-110, (2013)
  • [4] ARGYROUDIS S.A., MITOULIS S.A., HO-FER L., ZANINI M.A., TUBALDI E., FRANGOPOL D.M., Resilience assess-ment framework for critical infrastructure in a multi-hazard environment: Case study on transport assets, Science of The Total Environ-ment, 714, (2020)
  • [5] AZAD N., HASSINI E., VERMA M., Disruption risk management in railroad net-works: An optimization-based methodology and a case study, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 85, pp. 70-88, (2016)
  • [6] BALAL E., VALDEZ G., MIRAMONTES J., CHEU R.L., Comparative evaluation of measures for urban highway network resili-ence due to traffic incidents, International Jour-nal of Transportation Science and Technology, 8, 3, pp. 304-317, (2019)
  • [7] BIROLINI A., Basic Concepts, Quality and Reliability (RAMS) Assurance of Complex Equipment and Systems, (2017)
  • [8] BUCHEL B., CORMAN F., Modelling probability distributions of public transport travel time components, the 18th Swiss Transport Research Conference (STRC 2018), (2018)
  • [9] BUKOWSKI L., System of systems de-pendability - Theoretical models and applica-tions examples, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 151, pp. 76-92, (2016)
  • [10] CASSOTTANA B., SHEN L., CHING TANG L., Modeling the recovery pro-cess: A key dimension of resilience, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 190, (2019)