Analytical model and optimization analysis of combined damping system with TMD and particle damper

被引：0

作者：

Wang B.-S. ^{[1
]}

He H.-X. ^{[1
]}

Yan W.-M. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Beijing Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Retrofit, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing

来源：

Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics | 2021年 / 38卷 / 06期

关键词：

Damping mechanism; Optimization analysis; Particle damper; Structural vibration control; TMD;

D O I：

10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.07.0463

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

In the light of the characteristics and shortcomings of tuned mass damper (TMD) and particle damper, a combined damping scheme is proposed, which organically combines the parallel single-dimensional single particle damper (PSSPD) and TMD, i.e., the composite damping system of PSSPD and TMD in parallel. Based on the in-depth analysis of its damping mechanism, the impact force between the particles and the controlled structure is equivalent to the pulse force, and the mechanical model and vibration equation of the composite damping system are established. Firstly, the combination of time domain and frequency domain method has the outstanding characteristics, such as direct solving process, no need to solve differential equations and easy to solve the dynamic response subjected to special excitation forms, so this method is used to analyze and solve the model. Then the performance parameters of the system are analyzed, and the accuracy of the mechanical model and the feasibility of the optimization method are verified. Secondly, the parameter optimization method of the composite damping system subjected to ground motions is established and its rationality and accuracy are verified. Finally, the damping mechanism, performance and damping effect of PSSPD, TMD and composite damping system are compared and analyzed. The results show that the mechanical model of composite damping system based on time-frequency domain analysis can intuitively represent its damping mechanism with high accuracy and clear solution process, and the parameter optimization analysis method is reasonable, feasible and accurate. Meanwhile, the composite damping system effectively overcomes the shortcomings of TMD and PSSPD, and has better damping effect, wider damping frequency band and stronger robustness. Copyright ©2021 Engineering Mechanics. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：191 / 208

页数：17

共 30 条

[1]

Teng Jun, The theory, technology and method of structural vibration control, (2009)

[2]

Kwon H C, Kin M C, Lee I W., Vibration control of bridges under moving loads, Computer & Structures, 66, 4, pp. 473-480, (1998)

[3]

Symans M D, Charney F A, Whittaker A S, Et al., Energy dissipation systems for seismic applications: current practice and recent developments, Journal of Structural Engineering, 134, 1, pp. 3-21, (2008)

[4]

Longarini N, Zucca M., A chimney's seismic assessment by a tuned mass damper, Engineering Structures, 79, 15, pp. 290-296, (2014)

[5]

Zhang P, Song G, Li H, Et al., Seismic control of power transmission tower using pounding TMD, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 139, 10, pp. 1395-1406, (2013)

[6]

Wang W, Wang X, Hua X, Et al., Vibration control of vortex-induced vibrations of a bridge deck by a single-side pounding tuned mass damper, Engineering Structures, 173, 15, pp. 61-75, (2018)

[7]

Yan Weiming, Wang Baoshun, Huang Xuhong, Research progress of particle damper and its application prospect in civil engineering, China Civil Engineering Journal, 53, 5, pp. 1-10, (2020)

[8]

Lieber P J D P., An acceleration damper: development, design and some application, Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineer, 67, 7, pp. 523-530, (1945)

[9]

Zhang K, Chen T, Wang X, Et al., Rheology behavior and optimal damping effect of granular particles in a non-obstructive particle damper, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 364, 5, pp. 30-43, (2015)

[10]

Lu Zheng, Chen Xiaoyi, Zhang Dingchang, Dai Kaoshan, Experimental and analytical study on the performance of particle tuned mass dampers under seismic excitation, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 46, 5, pp. 697-714, (2017)

← 1 2 3 →