Study on Dynamic Strength Characteristics of Sand Solidified by Enzyme-Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (EICP)

被引:1
作者
Li, Gang [1 ]
Hua, Xueqing [1 ]
Liu, Jia [1 ]
Zhang, Yao [1 ]
Li, Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Xijing Univ, Shaanxi Key Lab Safety & Durabil Concrete Struct, Xian 710123, Peoples R China
[2] Guangyuan Nat Gas Co Ltd, Guangyuan 628000, Peoples R China
关键词
EICP; solidified sand; dynamic strength; cyclic stress ratio; vibration frequency; LIQUEFACTION RESISTANCE; SOIL; DEGRADATION;
D O I
10.3390/ma17204976
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Saturated sand foundations are susceptible to liquefaction under dynamic loads. This can result in roadbed subsidence, flotation of underground structures, and other engineering failures. Compared with the traditional foundation reinforcement technology, enzyme-induced calcium carbonate precipitation technology (EICP) is a green environmental protection reinforcement technology. The EICP technology can use enzymes to induce calcium carbonate to cement soil particles and fill soil pores, thus effectively improving soil strength and inhibiting sand liquefaction damage. The study takes EICP-solidified standard sand as the research object and, through the dynamic triaxial test, analyzes the influence of different confining pressure (sigma 3) cementation times (CT), cyclic stress ratio (CSR), dry density (rho d), and vibration frequency (f) on dynamic strength characteristics. Then, a modified dynamic strength model of EICP-solidified standard sand was established. The results show that, under the same confining pressure, the required vibration number for failure decreases with the increase in dynamic strength, and the dynamic strength increases with the rise in dry density. At the same number of cyclic vibrations, the greater the confining pressure and cementation times, the greater the dynamic strength. When the cementation times are constant, the dynamic strength of EICP-solidified sand decreases with the increase in the vibration number. When cementation times are 6, the dynamic strength of the specimens with CSR of 0.35 is 25.9% and 32.4% higher than those with CSR of 0.25 and 0.30, respectively. The predicted results show that the model can predict the measured values well, which fully verifies the applicability of the model. The research results can provide a reference for liquefaction prevention in sand foundations.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Cyclic liquefaction resistance of MICP- and EICP-treated sand in simple shear conditions: a benchmarking with the critical state of untreated sand
    Ahenkorah, Isaac
    Rahman, Md Mizanur
    Karim, Md Rajibul
    Beecham, Simon
    [J]. ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 2024, 19 (09) : 5891 - 5913
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, GB/T 50123-2019 Standard for geotechnical testing method
  • [3] Chen W.H., 2012, Adv. Mater. Res, V588589, P1979, DOI [10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.588-589.1979, DOI 10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/AMR.588-589.1979]
  • [4] Urease active bioslurry: a novel soil improvement approach based on microbially induced carbonate precipitation
    Cheng, Liang
    Shahin, Mohamed A.
    [J]. CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 53 (09) : 1376 - 1385
  • [5] [程晓辉 Cheng Xiaohui], 2013, [岩土工程学报, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering], V35, P1486
  • [6] [邓亚虹 Deng Yahong], 2012, [工程力学, Engineering Mechanics], V29, P281
  • [7] Soil improvement using plant-derived urease-induced calcium carbonate precipitation
    Dilrukshi, R. A. N.
    Nakashima, Kazunori
    Kawasaki, Satoru
    [J]. SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2018, 58 (04) : 894 - 910
  • [8] Dilrukshi R.A. N., 2016, J Civil Environ Eng, V6, P2, DOI DOI 10.4172/2165-784X.1000207
  • [9] Field trial on use of soybean crude extract for carbonate precipitation and wind erosion control of sandy soil
    Gao Yu-feng
    Meng Hao
    He Jia
    Qi Yong-shuai
    Hang Lei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY, 2020, 27 (11) : 3320 - 3333
  • [10] Calcium carbonate precipitation catalyzed by soybean urease as an improvement method for fine-grained soil
    Gao, Yufeng
    He, Jia
    Tang, Xinyi
    Chu, Jian
    [J]. SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2019, 59 (05) : 1631 - 1637