Improving diagnostics and prognostics of implantable cardioverter defibrillator batteries with interpretable machine learning models

被引:0
|
作者
Galuppini, Giacomo [1 ,3 ]
Liang, Qiaohao [1 ]
Tamirisa, Prabhakar A. [2 ]
Lemmerman, Jeffrey A. [2 ]
Sullivan, Melani G. [2 ]
Mazack, Michael J. M. [2 ]
Gomadam, Partha M. [2 ]
Bazant, Martin Z. [1 ]
Braatz, Richard D. [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Medtron Energy & Component Ctr, Brooklyn Ctr, MN USA
[3] Univ Pavia, Pavia, PV, Italy
关键词
Batteries; Defibrillators; Machine learning; Generalized additive models; Diagnostics; Prognostics; LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES; RESISTANCE; CELLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234668
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Medtronic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillators (CRT-Ds) rely on high-energy density, lithium batteries, which are manufactured with a special lithium/carbon monofluoride (CFx)-silver F x )-silver vanadium oxide (SVO) hybrid cathode design. Consistently high battery performance is crucial for this application, since poor performance may result in ineffective patient treatment, whereas early replacement may involve surgery and increase in maintenance costs. To evaluate performance, batteries are tested, both at the time of production and post-production, through periodic sampling carried out over multiple years. This considerable amount of experimental data is exploited for the first time in this work to develop a data-driven, machine learning approach, relying on Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) to predict battery performance, based on production data. GAMs combine prediction accuracy, which enables evaluation of battery performance immediately after production, with model interpretability, which provides clues on how to further improve battery design and production. Model interpretation allows to identify key features from the battery production data that offer physical insights to support future battery development, and foster the development of physics-based model for hybrid cathode batteries. The proposed approach is validated on 21 different datasets, targeting several performance-related features, and delivers consistently high prediction accuracy on test data.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving Utility Cables Diagnostics and Prognostics using Machine Learning
    Shekhar, Shishir
    Shekhar, Shashwat
    2023 IEEE PES GRID EDGE TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE & EXPOSITION, GRID EDGE, 2023,
  • [2] Toward Better Risk Stratification for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients: Implications of Explainable Machine Learning Models
    Deng, Yu
    Cheng, Sijing
    Huang, Hao
    Liu, Xi
    Yu, Yu
    Gu, Min
    Cai, Chi
    Chen, Xuhua
    Niu, Hongxia
    Hua, Wei
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE, 2022, 9 (09)
  • [3] Machine Learning in PV Fault Detection, Diagnostics and Prognostics: A Review
    Rodrigues, Sandy
    Ramos, Helena Geirinhas
    Morgado-Dias, F.
    2017 IEEE 44TH PHOTOVOLTAIC SPECIALIST CONFERENCE (PVSC), 2017, : 3178 - 3183
  • [4] Optimizing patient selection for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: utilizing multimodal machine learning to assess risk of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator non-benefit
    Kolk, Maarten Z. H.
    Ruiperez-Campillo, Samuel
    Deb, Brototo
    Bekkers, Erik J.
    Allaart, Cornelis P.
    Rogers, Albert J.
    van der Lingen, Anne-Lotte C. J.
    Florez, Laura Alvarez
    Isgum, Ivana
    De Vos, Bob D.
    Clopton, Paul
    Wilde, Arthur A. M.
    Knops, Reinoud E.
    Narayan, Sanjiv M.
    Tjong, Fleur V. Y.
    EUROPACE, 2023, 25 (09):
  • [5] Predicting electrical storms by remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients using machine learning
    Shakibfar, Saeed
    Krause, Oswin
    Lund-Andersen, Casper
    Aranda, Alfonso
    Moll, Jonas
    Andersen, Tariq Osman
    Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup
    Petersen, Helen Hogh
    Igel, Christian
    EUROPACE, 2019, 21 (02): : 268 - 274
  • [6] Preventing Overdiagnosis of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead Fractures Using Device Diagnostics
    Swerdlow, Charles D.
    Sachanandani, Haresh
    Gunderson, Bruce D.
    Ousdigian, Kevin T.
    Hjelle, Mark
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (23) : 2330 - 2339
  • [7] Role of deep learning methods in screening for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator in heart failure
    ElRefai, Mohamed
    Abouelasaad, Mohamed
    Wiles, Benedict M.
    Dunn, Anthony J.
    Coniglio, Stefano
    Zemkoho, Alain B.
    Morgan, John M.
    Roberts, Paul R.
    ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2023, 28 (01)
  • [8] Automated Prognostics and Diagnostics of Railway Tram Noises Using Machine Learning
    Huang, Junhui
    Liu, Hao
    Xi, Wenyan
    Kaewunruen, Sakdirat
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 183555 - 183563
  • [9] Interpretable machine learning models for crime prediction
    Zhang, Xu
    Liu, Lin
    Lan, Minxuan
    Song, Guangwen
    Xiao, Luzi
    Chen, Jianguo
    COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2022, 94
  • [10] Machine learning-derived cycle length variability metrics predict spontaneously terminating ventricular tachycardia in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients
    Sau, Arunashis
    Ahmed, Amar
    Chen, Jun Yu
    Pastika, Libor
    Wright, Ian
    Li, Xinyang
    Handa, Balvinder
    Qureshi, Norman
    Koa-Wing, Michael
    Keene, Daniel
    Malcolme-Lawes, Louisa
    Varnava, Amanda
    Linton, Nicholas W. F.
    Lim, Phang Boon
    Lefroy, David
    Kanagaratnam, Prapa
    Peters, Nicholas S.
    Whinnett, Zachary
    Ng, Fu Siong
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL - DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 5 (01): : 50 - 59