Mineral policy dynamics and their impact on equity market volatility in the global south: A multi-country analysis

被引：1

作者：

Awijen, Haithem ^{[1
]}

Ben Jabeur, Sami ^{[2
,3
]}

Ballouk, Houssein ^{[4
,5
]}

机构：

[1] Inseec Grande École, Omnes Education Group, Paris

[2] UCLy (Lyon Catholic University), ESDES, Lyon

[3] UCLy (Lyon Catholic University), UR CONFLUENCE : Sciences et Humanités, (EA1598), Lyon

[4] ESTA School of Business & Technology, Belfort

来源：

Resources Policy | 2024年 / 99卷

关键词：

Equity market; Natural resource policy; Spillovers; Volatility impulse response;

D O I：

10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105373

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This study investigates the complex interplay between natural resources policy amendments in the Global South countries and their subsequent impact on equity market volatility, particularly in Asian countries. It scrutinizes how legislative, statute, act, code, or executive decree changes jointly provoke equity market volatility. Utilizing the asymmetric volatility Multiplicative Error Model, our research reveals how alterations in mineral policies significantly affect equity market volatility across various nations in the Global South. Notably, China is the most significant influencer, alongside India and Malaysia. The results indicate a strong link between government actions, including policy reforms and fiscal strategies, and the propagation of market volatility. This connection underscores the growing interdependence among Asian stock indices. This study provides valuable perspectives for policymakers, investors, and stakeholders in the Global South seeking to navigate the complex economic implications of natural resources policy decisions on equity markets. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd

引用

共 62 条

[1]

Acemoglu D., Verdier T., The choice between market failures and corruption, Am. Econ. Rev., 91, pp. 194-211, (2000)

[2]

Acharya V.V., Pedersen L.H., Philippon T., Richardson M., Measuring systemic risk, Rev. Financ. Stud., 30, pp. 2-47, (2017)

[3]

Ahmad M., Peng T., Awan A., Ahmed Z., Policy framework considering resource curse, renewable energy transition, and institutional issues: Fostering sustainable development and sustainable natural resource consumption practices, Resour. Policy, 86, (2023)

[4]

Ali A.T., Malaysias move toward a high-income economy: Five decades of nation building a view from within, Breaking the Oil Spell: The Gulf Falcons Path To Diversification, (2016)

[5]

Ali A., Ramakrishnan S., Faisal F., Ghazi H., Sulimany H., Bazhair A.H., Stock market resource curse: The moderating role of institutional quality, Resour. Policy, 78, (2022)

[6]

Alvarez I.C., Barbero J., Rodriguez-Pose A., Zofio J.L., Does institutional quality matter for trade? Institutional conditions in a sectoral trade framework, World Dev., 103, pp. 72-87, (2018)

[7]

Ando T., Greenwood-Nimmo M., Shin Y., Quantile connectedness: modeling tail behavior in the topology of financial networks, Manage. Sci., 68, pp. 2401-2431, (2022)

[8]

Antonakakis N., Cunado J., Filis G., Gabauer D., de Gracia F.P., Oil and asset classes implied volatilities: Investment strategies and hedging effectiveness, Energy Econ., 91, (2020)

[9]

Axbard S., Benshaul-Tolonen A., Poulsen J., Natural resource wealth and crime: The role of international price shocks and public policy, J. Environ. Econom. Manage., 110, (2021)

[10]

Bai Y., Tang S., Lu C., Chen B., Yan M., Economic policy uncertainty and natural resource policy in the United States, Resour. Policy, 83, (2023)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →