Quantitative assessment and case study of CO2 geological storage in deep coal seams

被引：0

作者：

Liu, Cao ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Zhao, Chunhui ^{[1
,2
]}

Zhong, Fuping ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Qin, Shujie ^{[1
,2
]}

Wei, Canglong ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] School of Safety Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo

[2] State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Gas Geology and Gas Control, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo

[3] National Coal Field Engineering Research Center for Gas Geology and Gas Control (P.R.C), Jiaozuo

来源：

Meitan Kexue Jishu/Coal Science and Technology (Peking) | 2024年 / 52卷

关键词：

adsorption phase; assessment method; CO[!sub]2[!/sub] adsorption experiment; CO[!sub]2[!/sub] geological storage; deep coal seams;

D O I：

10.12438/cst.2023-0889

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Geological storage of CO2 as an idea carbon reduction technology is expected to become an important means of mitigating the greenhouse effect. Therefore, quantitatively assessing the potential of geological storage of CO2 in deep coal seams and investigating the interaction between supercritical CO2 and deep coal rocks have become a hot research topic. Taking Jiulishan coal sample from Jiaozuo mining area in Henan, China as the experimental research object, we analyse the mechanism of supercritical CO2 adsorption and sequestration in deep coal seams, carry out CO2 isothermal adsorption experiments of the coal samples at 35 ℃ and 45 ℃, explain and correct the error of negative adsorption isotherms under high pressure, and obtain the actual adsorption amount of CO2 of the coal sample at different temperatures. Here, we propose a new method for calculating CO2 geological storage capacity, which can not only correct the storage capacity miscalculation caused by Gibbs adsorption, but also can accurately evaluate CO2 theory and effective storage capacity in different burial depths of coal seams. results show that: ① In theory, adsorption saturation means that all adsorption sites have been occupied, the volume and density of the adsorption phase have stabilized, and the adsorption amount should no longer changes. However, all adsorption isotherms measured in the laboratory show that the adsorption amount decreases with the increase of pressure under high-pressure saturation stage, which does not conform to the Langmuir adsorption principle. Therefore, the adsorption isotherm measured in the laboratory must be corrected before it can be applied to the assessment of CO2 storage capacity in deep coal seams; ② The CO2 storage capacity in coal mainly consists of the adsorption and free CO2 amount. The adsorption CO2 amount needs to be calculated using the adsorption phase density and Gibbs adsorption amount, while the free CO2 amount needs to know the pore volume occupied by the free phase in coal. It can only be calculated based on the total pore volume in coal minus the adsorption phase volume. Therefore, the adsorption phase is the decisive factor for accurately evaluating the adsorption and free CO2 storage capacity; ③ Using a modified CO2 geological storage quantification model and taking the 800-2000 m deep coal seam in the Xiuwu research area of Jiaozuo mining area as an example, it is calculated that The theoretical storage capacity of CO2 per unit mass of coal is 1.52−2.16 mmol/g, The total effective storage capacity is 11.19×109 m3, which is equivalent to 21.97 Mt. This case not only corrected the mass balance miscalculation of Gibbs adsorption data, but also considered the impact of adsorption phase occupying pore space on free storage capacity, and thus, it has important implication for improving the accuracy of predicting CO2 geological storage capacity in deep coal seams. © 2024 China Coal Society. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：288 / 298

页数：10

共 38 条

[1] ZHAO Zongci, LUO Yong, HUANG Jianbin, Effect test of predicting global warming[J], Climate Change Research, 18, 5, pp. 641-643, (2022)
[2] SHEN Jian, QIN Yong, ZHANG Chunjie, Et al., Feasibility of enhanced coalbed methane recovery by CO2 sequestration into deep coalbed of Qinshui Basin[J], Journal of China Coal Society, 41, 1, (2016)
[3] BACHU S, BONIJOLY D，, BRADSHAW J, Et al., CO2 storage capacity estimation：methodology and gaps[J], International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 1, 4, (2007)
[4] WHITE C M，, SMITH D H，, JONES K L，, Et al., Sequestration of carbon dioxide in coal with enhanced coalbed methane recovery—a review[J], Energy & fuels, 19, 3, (2005)
[5] DUAN Pengfei, Coal seam CO2 geological sealing condition and potential evaluation in Hedong coalfield[J], Coal Geology of China, 27, 10, pp. 1-5, (2015)
[6] YAO Suping, TANG Zhongyi, TAN Lihua, Et al., The CO2 geological sealing conditions and potential evaluation in coal seams in Jiangsu province[J], Geological Journal of China Universities, 18, 2, (2012)
[7] HENDRIKS C，, GRAUS W，, BERGEN F., Global carbon dioxide storage potential and costs, (2004)
[8] REEVES S R., Assessment of CO2 sequestration and ECBM potential of U. S. coalbeds, (2003)
[9] LIU Yanfeng, LI Xiaochun, BAI Bing, Preliminary estimation of CO2 storage capacity of coalbeds in China[J], Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 24, 16, (2005)
[10] SIEMONS N, BUSCH A., Measurement and interpretation of supercritical CO2 sorption on various coals[J], International Journal of Coal Geology, 69, 4, (2007)

← 1 2 3 4 →