Analysis of ecological environment quality heterogeneity across different landform types in Myanmar and its driving forces

被引:3
作者
Shi, Shuangfu [1 ,2 ]
Peng, Shuangyun [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Zhiqiang [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Ziyi [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Dongling [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Yuanyuan [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Xiangmei [1 ,2 ]
Li, Ting [1 ]
Gong, Luping [1 ]
机构
[1] Yunnan Normal Univ, Fac Geog, Kunming 650500, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Educ Minist, GIS Technol Engn Res Ctr West China Resources & En, Kunming 650500, Yunnan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
RSEI; Landform types; Heterogeneity; Spatiotemporal evolution; Myanmar; VEGETATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112755
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecological Environmental Quality (EEQ) assessment is a crucial method for understanding regional ecological conditions and identifying ecological problems. Understanding how EEQ responds to various natural and anthropogenic factors under different landform conditions is extremely important to improve the accuracy and usefulness of the assessment. Landforms, as a key natural geographic element, influence not only the spatial distribution of EEQ, but also the nature and intensity of human activities. However, we lack a comprehensive understanding of how different landform types affect the ecological environment. In this paper, we quantitatively assessed the spatial heterogeneity characteristics of EEQ in Myanmar based on the Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI) model, and used Geodetector to reveal the driving mechanisms of EEQ in terms of the whole region and specific landform types. The results showed that: (1) The overall EEQ in Myanmar showed a fluctuating downward trend from 2000 to 2020, and the spatial heterogeneity is obvious. The plains and hills had poor EEQ, while the mountains, highlands and most of the northern regions have better EEQ. (2) The EEQ of different landform types differed significantly. The EEQ was best in middle relief mountains and poorer in plains and high relief mountains. (3) Land use, human footprint and net primary productivity (NPP) were the main factors affecting EEQ in Myanmar, and there are significant spatial and temporal dynamic interactions between different factors. (4) There were significant differences in the factors affecting EEQ between landform types. For example, EEQ in plains, hills, low relief mountains, and middle relief mountains was influenced by a combination of natural and anthropogenic factors. In contrast, upland mountain areas were mainly influenced by natural factors alone. As the degree of landform fluctuation increases, the influence of each factor generally showed a downward trend. This study reveals the spatio-temporal variation characteristics of Myanmar's EEQ, key driving factors, and differential response mechanisms of ecological environment evolution under different landform types, and provides a scientific basis for formulating ecosystem protection and restoration strategies based on local conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Environmental variables drive spatial patterns of trophic diversity in mammals
    Adkins, Jaron
    Hammill, Edd
    Abdulwahab, Umarfarooq A.
    Draper, John P.
    Wolf, J. Marshall
    McClure, Catherine M.
    Ortiz, Adrian A. Gonzalez
    Chavez, Emily A.
    Atwood, Trisha B.
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2023, 26 (11) : 1940 - 1950
  • [2] Landforms characterization of Saudi Arabia: Towards a geomorphological map
    Almalki, Khalid A.
    Al Mosallam, Mobarak S.
    Aldaajani, Thamer Z.
    Al-Namazi, Ali A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2022, 112
  • [3] Ending the Cinderella status of terraces and lynchets in Europe: The geomorphology of agricultural terraces and implications for ecosystem services and climate adaptation
    Brown, Antony G.
    Fallu, Daniel
    Walsh, Kevin
    Cucchiaro, Sara
    Tarolli, Paolo
    Zhao, Pengzhi
    Pears, Ben R.
    van Oost, Kristof
    Snape, Lisa
    Lang, Andreas
    Albert, Rosa Maria
    Alsos, Inger G.
    Waddington, Clive
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2021, 379
  • [4] Habitat Quality Effect and Driving Mechanism of Land Use Transitions: A Case Study of Henan Water Source Area of the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project
    Chen, Meijing
    Bai, Zhongke
    Wang, Qingri
    Shi, Zeyu
    [J]. LAND, 2021, 10 (08)
  • [5] Ecological health assessment of Tibetan alpine grasslands in Gannan using remote sensed ecological indicators
    Du, Zeyu
    Ji, Xibin
    Liu, Jane
    Zhao, Wenyue
    He, Zhibin
    Jiang, Jiachang
    Yang, Qiyue
    Zhao, Liwen
    Gao, Jinlong
    [J]. GEO-SPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2025, 28 (01) : 246 - 264
  • [6] Impact of flow regulation on stream morphology and habitat quality distribution
    Duffin, Jenna
    Yager, Elowyn M.
    Buffington, John M.
    Benjankar, Rohan
    Borden, Carter
    Tonina, Daniele
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 878
  • [7] Temporal scope influences ecosystem driver-response relationships: A case study of Lake Erie with implications for ecosystem-based management
    Fraker, Michael E.
    Sinclair, James S.
    Frank, Kenneth T.
    Hood, James M.
    Ludsin, Stuart A.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 813
  • [8] Environmental determinants impacting the spatial heterogeneity of karst ecosystem services in Southwest China
    Gao, Jiangbo
    Zuo, Liyuan
    Liu, Wanlu
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 32 (04) : 1718 - 1731
  • [9] Landsat TM/OLI-Based Ecological and Environmental Quality Survey of Yellow River Basin, Inner Mongolia Section
    Gao, Wenlong
    Zhang, Shengwei
    Rao, Xinyu
    Lin, Xi
    Li, Ruishen
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [10] Vegetation differentiation in the patterned landscape of the central Everglades: importance of local and landscape drivers
    Givnish, Thomas J.
    Volin, John C.
    Owen, V. Dianne
    Volin, Valeria C.
    Muss, Jordan D.
    Glaser, Paul H.
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2008, 17 (03): : 384 - 402