Advantages and Limitations of Bayesian Approaches to Decision-Making in Construction Management: A Critical Review (1988-2023)

被引:0
作者
Mejia, Guillermo [1 ]
Gutierrez-Prada, Jaime A. [1 ]
Portilla-Carreno, Oscar H. [1 ]
Soto-Paz, Jonathan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ind Santander, Dept Civil Engn, Grp Invest Mat & Estruct Construcc INME, Calle 9 23, Bucaramanga 680002, Santander, Colombia
[2] Univ Invest & Desarrollo, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Res Grp,Threats Vulnerabil & Risks Nat Phenomena A, Calle 9 23-55, Bucaramanga 680002, Santander, Colombia
来源
ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART A-CIVIL ENGINEERING | 2024年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
Bayesian techniques; Construction management; Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) review; Bibliometric analysis; RISK-RELATED KNOWLEDGE; NETWORK MODEL; SUPPORT; FUZZY; PROJECTS; TUNNEL; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; DESIGN; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1363
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The construction industry has undergone a significant transformation with the advent of Industrial Digitalization 4.0, generating massive amounts of data across all phases of construction projects. This data explosion presents both opportunities and challenges for construction management in terms of effectively managing information and extracting valuable knowledge to support decision-making. In response to this challenge, the Bayesian approach has emerged as a powerful framework for addressing the complexities and uncertainties inherent in construction projects. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the development and applications of Bayesian approaches in construction management. Based on a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) systematic review methodology and supported by objective analytics techniques and digital tools, the study delineates the conceptual and methodological evolution from 1988 to 2023 of four primary Bayesian approaches: estimation-inference, modeling, simulation, and classification. The review synthesizes the advantages, limitations, and challenges associated with these approaches, highlighting their potential to incorporate prior knowledge, update beliefs based on new evidence, and model complex relationships among variables. The findings reveal a mature and diverse research landscape, with Bayesian methods being leveraged to improve decision-making across various stages and aspects of construction projects. As the construction industry continues to embrace digital transformation and data-driven approaches, the integration of Bayesian methods with emerging technologies and practices is likely to open up new opportunities for enhanced decision support and project success. This study provides valuable insights for researchers and practitioners seeking to leverage the power of Bayesian approaches in construction management.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cooperative Critical Turning Point-Based Decision-Making and Planning for CAVH Intersection Management System
    Li, Shen
    Shu, Keqi
    Zhou, Yang
    Cao, Dongpu
    Ran, Bin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 23 (08) : 11062 - 11072
  • [32] Shared Decision-Making in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Elias, Sabrina
    Chen, Yuling
    Liu, Xiaoyue
    Slone, Sarah
    Turkson-Ocran, Ruth-Alma
    Ogungbe, Bunmi
    Thomas, Sabena
    Byiringiro, Samuel
    Koirala, Binu
    Asano, Reiko
    Baptiste, Diana-Lyn
    Mollenkopf, Nicole L.
    Nmezi, Nwakaego
    Commodore-Mensah, Yvonne
    Himmelfarb, Cheryl R. Dennison
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (03)
  • [33] Implementing a Choosing-by-Advantages Decision-Making Method to Evaluate the Critical Success Factors of Mass-Timber Building Materials in the US
    Ahmed, Shafayet
    Arocho, Ingrid
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 148 (10)
  • [34] Personalized Pancreatic Cancer Management A Systematic Review of How Machine Learning Is Supporting Decision-making
    Bradley, Alison
    van der Meer, Robert
    McKay, Colin
    PANCREAS, 2019, 48 (05) : 598 - 604
  • [35] Decision-Making Model Construction of Emergency Material Allocation for Critical Incidents Based on BP Neural Network Algorithm: An Overview
    Yan, Yan
    ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 31 (06) : 3497 - 3513
  • [36] APPLICATION OF MULTIPLE-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING TECHNIQUES AND APPROACHES TO EVALUATING OF SERVICE QUALITY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
    Mardani, Abbas
    Jusoh, Ahmad
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Khalifah, Zainab
    Nor, Khalil Md
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 16 (05) : 1034 - 1068
  • [37] Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of Municipal Solid Waste Management: A review
    Soltani, Atousa
    Hewage, Kasun
    Reza, Bahareh
    Sadiq, Rehan
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 35 : 318 - 328
  • [38] On the application of multi-criteria decision-making methods in environmental pollution management: a comprehensive systematic review
    Safarzadeh, Soroush
    Jafari, Hamed
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2025,
  • [39] Livelihood alternatives model for sustainable rangeland management: a review of multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Khedrigharibvand, Hojatollah
    Azadi, Hossein
    Teklemariam, Dereje
    Houshyar, Ehsan
    De Maeyer, Philippe
    Witlox, Frank
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 21 (01) : 11 - 36
  • [40] Construction Project Safety Performance Management Using Analytic Network Process (ANP) as a Multicriteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Tool
    Gunduz, Murat
    Khader, Basil K.
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 2020