Five-year clinical follow-up of bulk-fill restorative materials in class II restorations

被引：0
作者：
Gürses, Merve [1 ]
Inan, Bahar [2 ]
Cobanoglu, Nevin [1 ]
Türkmen, Atiye Tugba Kuzgun [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Selçuk University, Alaeddin Keykubat Campus, İsmet Paşa Street, No:309, Selcuklu, Konya
[2] Karacigan, Enntepe Mall Office, No:1/7 A Blok Floor:7, Karatay, Konya
来源：
Dental Materials Journal | 2024年 / 43卷 / 05期
关键词：
Class II restoration; Clinical observation; High-viscosity glass ionomer; Modified USPHS;
D O I：
10.4012/dmj.2024-132
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
This study evaluates the 5-year clinical performance of Class II restorations performed with different bulk-fill restorative materials. In the study, Class II restorations performed with Tetric Bulk-Fill (TBF), Filtek Bulk-Fill (FBF), and Equia Forte Fil (EF) were evaluated. One hundred-nineteen restorations were included in the study. Restorations were assessed during the 6th month, 1st, 2nd, and 5th year. Cochran Q, Pearson chi-square, and Fisher-Freeman-Halton tests were used for statistical analysis. In the 5th year, significant differences were observed in terms of retention, color match, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, surface texture, and anatomical form in all materials. There was a significant difference between EF and bulk-fill composites only in terms of retention and anatomical form. EF was significantly less successful than bulk-fill composites with regard to retention and anatomical form, but bulk-fill composites have shown similar clinical performance. EF cannot be an alternative to bulk-fill composites for Class II restorations. © 2024, Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：746 / 754
页数：8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [11] Ilie N, Kessler A, Durner J., Influence of various irradiation processes on the mechanical properties and polymerisation kinetics of bulk-fill resin based composites, J Dent, 41, pp. 695-702, (2013)
  • [12] Li X, Pongprueksa P, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J., Curing profile of bulk-fill resin-based composites, J Dent, 43, pp. 664-672, (2015)
  • [13] Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E, Oztas SS, Cakir FY., Four-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system, Oper Dent, 40, pp. 134-143, (2015)
  • [14] Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E, Oztas SS, Cakir FY., Clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system: A 6-year evaluation, Clin Oral Investig, 21, pp. 2335-2343, (2017)
  • [15] Burke FJT., Dental materials —What goes where? The current status of glass ionomer as a material for loadbearing restorations in posterior teeth, Dent Update, 40, pp. 840-844, (2013)
  • [16] Berg JH, Croll TP., Glass ionomer restorative cement systems: An update, Pediatr Dent, 37, pp. 116-124, (2015)
  • [17] Friedl K, Hiller KA, Friedl KH., Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer based restoration system: A retrospective cohort study, Dent Mater, 27, pp. 1031-1037, (2011)
  • [18] Celik EU, Tunac AT, Yilmaz F., A randomized, controlled, split-mouth trial evaluating the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer restorations in noncarious cervical lesions: Two-year results, J Adhes Dent, 20, pp. 299-305, (2018)
  • [19] Bagheri R, Palamara J, Mese A, Manton DJ., Effect of a self-adhesive coating on the load-bearing capacity of tooth-coloured restorative materials, Aust Dent J, 62, pp. 71-78, (2017)
  • [20] Kielbassa AM, Glockner G, Wolgin M, Glockner K., Systematic review on highly viscous glass-ionomer cement/resin coating restorations (Part I): Do they merge Minamata Convention and minimum intervention dentistry?, Quintessence Int, 47, pp. 813-823, (2016)
12345