A Formal Model for Integrating Consent Management Into MLOps

被引:0
作者
Peyrone, Neda [1 ]
Wichadakul, Duangdao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Comp Engn, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Med, Ctr Excellence Syst Biol, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2024年 / 12卷
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Ethics; General Data Protection Regulation; Process control; Regulation; Privacy; Data models; Monitoring; Law; Guidelines; Consensus protocol; GDPR; AI act; consent management; event-B; AI governance; MLOps; AI; PROTECTION;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3471773
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In the artificial intelligence (AI) era, data has become increasingly essential for learning and analysis. AI enables automated decision-making that may lead to violation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The GDPR is the data protection law within the European Union (EU) that allows individuals ('data subjects') to control their personal data. According to the law, automated decision-making can be permitted where data subjects give explicit consent. Therefore, consent management (CM) has become an essential software component for managing data subjects' data lifecycle and their consent. Bringing machine learning (ML) into production needs machine learning operations (MLOps). MLOps is a set of processes for delivering ML artifacts reliably and efficiently. However, current MLOps frameworks neglect the integration of CM into their processes, leading to the risk of GDPR violations. This research proposes a formal model for integrating CM into MLOps that takes upfront privacy by design (PbD). Finally, we provided a mapping from the formal model to a class diagram as guidelines to integrate CM into MLOps and demonstrated how to apply the proposed class diagram to existing ML developments, such as machine unlearning, in conjunction with the Purchase dataset.
引用
收藏
页码:142524 / 142541
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rodin: An open toolset for modelling and reasoning in Event-B
    Abrial J.-R.
    Butler M.
    Hallerstede S.
    Hoang T.S.
    Mehta F.
    Voisin L.
    [J]. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 2010, 12 (06) : 447 - 466
  • [2] Agarwal N, 2020, 2020 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (SSCI), P1528, DOI [10.1109/ssci47803.2020.9308260, 10.1109/SSCI47803.2020.9308260]
  • [3] Synthesising Privacy by Design Knowledge Toward Explainable Internet of Things Application Designing in Healthcare
    Alkhariji, Lamya
    Alhirabi, Nada
    Alraja, Mansour Naser
    Barhamgi, Mahmoud
    Rana, Omer
    Perera, Charith
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA COMPUTING COMMUNICATIONS AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 17 (02)
  • [4] Decentralized Machine Learning Governance: Overview, Opportunities, and Challenges
    Alsagheer, Dana
    Xu, Lei
    Shi, Weidong
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 96718 - 96732
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2014, Informatik
  • [6] Batool A, 2023, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2401.10896
  • [7] AI governance: themes, knowledge gaps and future agendas
    Birkstedt, Teemu
    Minkkinen, Matti
    Tandon, Anushree
    Mantymaki, Matti
    [J]. INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 33 (07) : 133 - 167
  • [8] Bourtoule L, 2021, P IEEE S SECUR PRIV, P141, DOI 10.1109/SP40001.2021.00019
  • [9] Breen S., 2020, Business Information Review, V37, P19, DOI 10.1177/0266382120903254
  • [10] Cavoukian A., 2009, Rep.