Investigation into the catalytic cracking/reforming of biomass pyrolysis gas by biochar supported Ni-Ca catalyst

被引:0
作者
Sun Z. [1 ]
Huang S. [1 ]
Shi H. [1 ]
Li H. [1 ]
Li H. [1 ]
Guo Y. [1 ]
Du Y. [1 ]
Pang R. [1 ]
Yi W. [2 ]
Li X. [1 ]
Dong Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Life Science and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai'an
[2] School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo
来源
Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering | 2021年 / 37卷 / 17期
关键词
Biomass; Catalytic cracking/reforming; Pyrolysis; Pyrolysis gas;
D O I
10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.17.024
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pyrolysis is widely considered as one of the most effective thermal chemical technologies to convert biomass into high value-added products. However, the biomass tar is inevitably formed during pyrolysis gaseous production. The removal of biomass tar has posed a great challenge to the further commercialization of biomass gasification in recent years. In the present work, a systematic investigation was made to realize the efficient conversion into syngas (H2+CO) using the biochar (BC) supported nickel-calcium catalyst for the biomass tar cracking/reforming. The catalysts were prepared via the one-step pyrolysis of NiCl2, together with CaCl2 pre-loaded biomass at 800℃. Five types of catalysts were also synthesized, including 2Ni-Ca/BC (0.02 mol Ni and 0.01 mol Ca), 2Ni-2Ca/BC (0.02 mol Ni and 0.02 mol Ca), Ni/BC (0.04 mol Ni), Ca/BC (0.04 mol Ca), and BC (without Ni and Ca). Subsequently, the ASAP 2020 Micromeritics instrument was applied to determine the texture structure of catalysts, including specific surface area, the total pore volume, and mean pore diameter. The phase compositions of catalysts were identified by the X-ray Diffractometer (XRD). The morphology and microstructure of catalysts were also characterized using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). A laser Raman spectrometer was used for the surface structure of catalysts. The coke amount of catalyst was determined via a thermal gravimetric analyzer equipped with Mass Spectrometry (MS). The gas composition was finally analyzed using Gas Chromatography (GC). The results indicated that the addition of calcium decreased the crystallite sizes of Ni for the better catalytic performance of catalysts. The graphitization of surface carbon in the 2Ni-Ca/BC catalyst was higher than that in the Ni/BC and Ca/BC catalysts, particularly in the presence of carbon nanotubes. Furthermore, the reaction temperature for all the catalysts greatly contributed to the tar cracking/reforming and syngas production. Alternatively, the catalyst type was another dominant factor during the processing. The catalytic performance was also ranked in the decreased order of 2Ni-Ca/BC, 2Ni-2Ca/BC, Ni/BC, Ca/BC, and BC, in terms of tar cracking and selectivity to the syngas production. Correspondingly, the tar conversion efficiency and syngas yield obtained from 2Ni-Ca/BC catalyst at 700℃ were 91.8% and 607.6 mL/g (H2/CO=1.05), respectively. More importantly, the tar conversion efficiency and syngas yield increased by only 0.7% and 7.6%, respectively, when the cracking/reforming temperature increased from 700 to 800℃, indicating that an excellent catalytic performance occurred at a relatively low temperature. The 2Ni-Ca/BC catalyst performed well in the higher stability after 210 min at 700oC, where the tar conversion efficiency, H2, and CO yields were achieved about 83%, 275 mL/g, and 268 mL/g, respectively. There was no obvious sintering of active, where only a handful of coke (3.6 mmol/g) was produced within 480 min at 700℃, indicating that the 2Ni-Ca/BC catalyst presented an excellent resistance to sintering and coke deposition. © 2021, Editorial Department of the Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 217
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]  
Ashok J, Kathiraser Y, Ang M L, Et al., Bi-functional hydrotalcite-derived NiO-CaO-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> catalysts for steam reforming of biomass and/or tar model compound at low steam-to-carbon conditions, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 172, pp. 116-128, (2015)
[12]  
Guo F, Li X, Liu Y, Et al., Catalytic cracking of biomass pyrolysis tar over char-supported catalysts, Energy Conversion and Management, 167, pp. 81-90, (2018)
[13]  
Guo F, Jia X, Liang S, Et al., Development of biochar-based nanocatalysts for tar cracking/reforming during biomass pyrolysis and gasification, Bioresource Technology, 298, (2020)
[14]  
Zhang S, Yin H, Wang J, Et al., Catalytic cracking of biomass tar using Ni nanoparticles embedded carbon nanofiber/porous carbon catalysts, Energy, 261, (2020)
[15]  
Huang S, Xu H, Li H, Guo Y, Et al., Preparation and characterization of char supported Ni-Cu nanoalloy catalyst for biomass tar cracking together with syngas-rich gas production, Fuel Processing Technology, 218, (2021)
[16]  
Zhang S, Zhu S, Zhang H, Et al., High quality H<sub>2</sub>-rich syngas production from pyrolysis-gasification of biomass and plastic wastes by Ni-Fe@Nanofibers/Porous carbon catalyst, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44, 48, pp. 26193-26203, (2019)
[17]  
Yang F, Cao J, Zhao X, Et al., Acid washed lignite char supported bimetallic Ni-Co catalyst for low temperature catalytic reforming of corncob derived volatiles, Energy Conversion and Management, 196, pp. 1257-1266, (2019)
[18]  
Daorattanachai P, Laosiripojana W, Laobuthee A, Et al., Type of contribution: Research article catalytic activity of sewage sludge char supported Re-Ni bimetallic catalyst toward cracking/reforming of biomass tar, Renewable Energy, 121, pp. 644-651, (2018)
[19]  
Dong Q, Zhang S, Li H, Et al., Catalytic cracking of biomass tar together with syngas production over red brick powder-supported nickel catalysts, Fuel Processing Technology, 194, (2019)
[20]  
Ju F, Liu C, Li K, Et al., Reactive adsorption desulfurization of FCC gasoline over a Ca-doped Ni-ZnO/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-SiO<sub>2</sub> adsorbent, Energy&Fuels, 30, 8, pp. 6688-6697, (2016)